14 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Kalin

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2446 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 687 times
    In Kalin, 12 N.Y.3d 225, 878 N.Y.S.2d 653, 906 N.E.2d 381, the Court of Appeals examined an information which had charged the defendant with, among other things, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree for the possession of nine plastic bags of heroin.
  2. People v. Dumay

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4038 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 502 times
    Finding factual allegations in information sufficient to support obstructing governmental administration charge, where information alleged that defendant slammed the trunk of police car and stood behind car preventing it from moving
  3. People v. Dreyden

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 5243 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 404 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the gravity knife law "distinguishes gravity knives from certain folding knives that cannot readily be opened by gravity or centrifugal force"
  4. People v. Keizer

    100 N.Y.2d 114 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 175 times
    In Keizer, we held that, where there was a jurisdictionally sufficient accusatory instrument, a claim of error based on a guilty plea in violation of CPL 220.10 to a crime that is of a lesser grade, but not a lesser included offense (CPL 1.20[37]) of a crime charged in the accusatory instrument was forfeited by the guilty plea (see 100 N.Y.2d at 119, 760 N.Y.S.2d 720, 790 N.E.2d 1149).
  5. People v. Thomas

    4 N.Y.3d 143 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 152 times
    In People v. Thomas, 4 NY3d 143 (2005), the Court of Appeals held that, at any time before trial or a guilty plea, the People are permitted to add new facts and joinable offenses by filing a superseding information.
  6. People v. Hightower

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8960 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 78 times
    In Hightower, the Court reversed the judgment of conviction and dismissed an accusatory instrument, holding that "[a]though the information in th[at] case described the events with enough clarity to provide reasonable cause that defendant was engaged in [the class B misdemeanors charged therein],... it was jurisdictionally defective as to the crime of which defendant was actually convicted—petit larceny," a class A misdemeanor (18 N.Y.3d at 254, 938 N.Y.S.2d 500, 961 N.E.2d 1111).
  7. People v. Warrington

    2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8584 (N.Y. 2016)   Cited 64 times

    12-22-2016 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Brandon WARRINGTON, Respondent. Kathleen B. Hogan, District Attorney, Lake George (Jason M. Carusone and Emilee B. Davenport of counsel), for appellant. Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for respondent. Kathleen B. Hogan, District Attorney, Lake George (Jason M. Carusone and Emilee B. Davenport of counsel), for appellant. Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for respondent. OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed

  8. State v. Cuadrado

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9905 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 81 times
    In People v. Cuadrado, 9 N.Y.3d 362, 365, 850 N.Y.S.2d 375, 880 N.E.2d 861 (2007), the Court of Appeals expressly declined to create an exception for “fundamental” or “jurisdictional” defects, and defendant's arguments for collateral review in this regard are unavailing.
  9. Matter of Jamie D

    59 N.Y.2d 589 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 65 times
    Defining weapon as "'as instrument of offensive or defensive combat'" (quoting WEBSTER'S THIRD NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY 2589)
  10. People v. Johnson

    89 N.Y.2d 905 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 41 times
    Noting New York courts approve "plea to the technically nonexistent crime of an attempt to commit a specific crime which, by definition, is committed without intent"