33 Cited authorities

  1. Barker v. Wingo

    407 U.S. 514 (1972)   Cited 9,919 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant who fails to demand speedy trial does not forever waive that constitutional right
  2. United States v. Marion

    404 U.S. 307 (1971)   Cited 3,233 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process places some restraints on government delay in bringing an indictment
  3. Zedner v. U.S.

    547 U.S. 489 (2006)   Cited 771 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding statutory text clear that “findings must be made, if only in the judge's mind, before granting the continuance”
  4. People v. Kendzia

    64 N.Y.2d 331 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 486 times
    Holding that the time it takes to decide the defendant's speedy trial motion is excludable
  5. People v. Berkowitz

    50 N.Y.2d 333 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 471 times
    Holding that a conspiracy defendant whose sole alleged co-conspirator had been previously acquitted of the conspiracy charge could not utilize the doctrine of collateral estoppel as a bar to his own prosecution because that there will often be significant disparities in the proof available against each of two separately tried defendants and a verdict of acquittal is not necessarily a determination of innocence
  6. People v. England

    84 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 188 times
    Finding a "ready for trial" statement insufficient to meet speedy trial requirements when, due to failure to obtain indictment within six months, trial not possible
  7. People v. Santos

    68 N.Y.2d 859 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 228 times

    Argued September 10, 1986 Decided October 14, 1986 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Alfred H. Kleiman, J. Oren Root, Jr., and Patrick M. Wall for appellant. Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Jeffrey Scott Sarokin and Norman Barclay of counsel), for respondent. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be modified to the extent of remitting the case to Supreme Court, New York County, for a hearing on the branch of defendant's

  8. People v. Lomax

    50 N.Y.2d 351 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 256 times
    In Lomax, the "defendant's papers contained averments which indicated that there were several periods of time following his first arraignment during which the criminal action against him was delayed due to pretrial motions that had been made by the defense.
  9. People v. Sibblies

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2377 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 85 times
    Holding statement of readiness invalid in light of People's subsequent statement of unreadiness based on the need to obtain medical records
  10. People v. Stirrup

    91 N.Y.2d 434 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 135 times
    Stating that criminal court obtains personal jurisdiction over defendant upon filing of accusatory instrument and defendant's appearance in court