44 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 52,366 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding that law enforcement officers must warn an individual of certain constitutional rights and the consequences of waiving those rights prior to conducting a custodial interrogation
  2. Arizona v. Fulminante

    499 U.S. 279 (1991)   Cited 4,561 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the doctrine of harmless error applies to the violation of the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination through the admission at trial of an involuntary confession
  3. Dickerson v. United States

    530 U.S. 428 (2000)   Cited 1,915 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the protections announced in Miranda ” are “constitutionally required”
  4. Chambers v. Mississippi

    410 U.S. 284 (1973)   Cited 5,204 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Mississippi voucher and hearsay rules were unconstitutional as applied to the extent that they prevented the defendant from: putting on evidence of a third party's confession to the crime with which the defendant was charged and challenging that witness's subsequent retraction
  5. Crane v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 683 (1986)   Cited 2,612 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the state court's exclusion of evidence probative of the credibility of the defendant's confession because the proffered evidence was relevant to voluntariness, an issue the court had already ruled on, violated the defendant's right to a fair trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments
  6. Corley v. United States

    556 U.S. 303 (2009)   Cited 566 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts must decide whether the delay beyond six hours was reasonable before admitting any confession made after that period
  7. Mallory v. United States

    354 U.S. 449 (1957)   Cited 1,110 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the confession made by the defendant while in custody is inadmissible because the defendant's untimely arraignment under Rule 5 rendered his custody unlawful
  8. Spano v. New York

    360 U.S. 315 (1959)   Cited 871 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that using a patrolman who was the suspect's childhood friend to convince the suspect to confess so that the patrolman would not be in trouble from his superiors was coercive
  9. People v. Yukl

    25 N.Y.2d 585 (N.Y. 1969)   Cited 947 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that reasonable innocent man in defendant's position would not have considered himself "in custody" during interview at police station where he had called police, voluntarily accompanied officers to police station, and voluntarily answered questions
  10. People v. Tucker

    55 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 573 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Tucker, we observed that, where a repugnant verdict was the result, not of irrationality, but mercy, courts "should not... undermine the jury's role and participation by setting aside the verdict" (55 NY2d at 7).