11 Cited authorities

  1. TIG Insurance v. Sedgwick James of Washington

    276 F.3d 754 (5th Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,364 times
    Holding that conclusory assertions are insufficient to avoid summary judgment
  2. United States v. Solvay Pharm., Inc.

    871 F.3d 318 (5th Cir. 2017)   Cited 86 times
    Holding that employees failed to show pretext where they "admit[ted] that they violated [the employer's] marketing policies and that employees may be terminated for marketing policy violations."
  3. United States v. Yanez Sosa

    513 F.3d 194 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 112 times
    Holding that "lay testimony ‘results from a process of reasoning familiar in everyday life,’ while expert testimony ‘results from a process of reasoning which can be mastered only by specialists in the field.’ " (quoting FED. R. EVID . 701, Advisory Committee Notes to 2000 Amendments)
  4. In re Remec Inc. Securities Litigation

    702 F. Supp. 2d 1202 (S.D. Cal. 2010)   Cited 44 times
    Finding plaintiffs' expert witness was a proper rebuttal witness, despite expert conducting his own analysis, because the expert's analysis contradicted defendants' expert witness's opinion on the same subject matter
  5. U.S. v. Hart

    295 F.3d 451 (5th Cir. 2002)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that there was a "total absence of any independent testimony to support [the witness's] assumptions in preparing [the demonstrative exhibits]"
  6. United States v. Solvay S.A.

    CIVIL ACTION H-06-2662 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2016)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    CIVIL ACTION H-06-2662 03-31-2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. JOHN KING and TAMMY DRUMMOND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SOLVAY S.A., et al., Defendants. Gray H. Miller United States District Judge ORDER Pending before the court is a motion for partial summary judgment on Relators John King and Tammy Drummond's (collectively, "Relators") off-label promotion theories of False Claims Act liability. Dkt. 476. The State of Texas has also filed a statement of interest related to this motion. Dkt. 592.

  7. Roehrs v. Conesys

    332 F. App'x 184 (5th Cir. 2009)   Cited 7 times
    Affirming district court's decision to strike untimely supplemental evidence offered in response to motion to summary judgment without obtaining leave of court
  8. United States v. Tann

    425 F. Supp. 2d 26 (D.D.C. 2006)   Cited 5 times

    Criminal Action No. 04-392CKK. March 21, 2006. Howard Bernard Katzoff, Law Offices Of Howard Katzoff, Washington, DC, Jonathan Jeffress, Federal Public Defender, Washington, DC, Marie Elise Haldane, Washington, DC, for defendant. Chad Sarchio, John P. Carlin, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for U.S. MEMORANDUM OPINION KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Defendant, in her "Pre-Trial Statement and Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Instructions," offers three arguments that require resolution pending

  9. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 18,985 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party
  10. Rule 802 - The Rule Against Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 802   Cited 3,786 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing federal statutes, the Federal Rules of Evidence, or Supreme Court rules as sources for exceptions to the rule against hearsay
  11. Rule 805 - Hearsay Within Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 805   Cited 869 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Allowing hearsay within hearsay only "if each part of the combined statements conforms with an exception to the rule"