4 Cited authorities

  1. Lanard Toys Ltd. v. Novelty, Inc.

    375 F. App'x 705 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 221 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a failure to comply with Rule 26 was harmless where the non-moving party offering the report served a preliminary expert declaration prior to the discovery deadline, produced a "supplemental" expert declaration seven months before trial, and the moving party did not attempt to depose the expert
  2. Certain DAPs v Defendants (In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig.)

    MDL No 1917 (N.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2015)   Cited 2 times

    MDL No 1917 Case No 14-cv-2058-SC Master Case No 3:07-cv-05944SC 07-20-2015 IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Order Relates To: Certain DAPs v Defendants Vaughn R Walker Special Master Law Office of Vaughn R Walker Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2200 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 871-2888 Fax: (415) 871-2890 vrw@judgewalker.com Honorable Samuel Conti United States District Judge Vaughn R Walker Special Master Law Office of Vaughn R Walker Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2200

  3. Whitlock v. Pepsi Americas

    Case No. 08-cv-02742-SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2015)

    Case No. 08-cv-02742-SI 02-11-2015 HARRY WHITLOCK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PEPSI AMERICAS, et al., Defendants. SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER AND TO SUPPLEMENT EXPERT REPORTS AND SETTING FEBRUARY 27, 2015 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Re: Dkt. No. 266 Currently before the Court is plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the scheduling order and to supplement her expert report. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court

  4. Kamakahi v. American Society for Reproductive Medicine

    Case No. 11-cv-01781-JCS (N.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2014)

    Case No. 11-cv-01781-JCS 12-15-2014 LINDSAY KAMAKAHI, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, et al., Defendants. JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO STRIKE DA UBERT MOTION Re: Dkt. Nos. 151-3, 152 I. INTRODUCTION The parties dispute the timeliness and propriety of two documents filed, or sought to be filed, in relation to Plaintiffs' pending motion for class