64 Cited authorities

  1. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Ass'n

    453 U.S. 1 (1981)   Cited 1,384 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that displacement of a federal common law injunctive action necessarily implies that a damages action brought for the same claim is also displaced
  2. CTS Corp. v. Waldburger

    573 U.S. 1 (2014)   Cited 421 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a statute of limitations creates a time limit for suing in a civil case, based on the date when the claim accrued”
  3. Tull v. United States

    481 U.S. 412 (1987)   Cited 1,008 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party had a right to trial by jury in civil claims brought by the government
  4. Brill v. City of New York

    2 N.Y.3d 648 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 1,607 times
    Holding that the movant must provide courts with a satisfactory explanation for missing CPLR 3212 deadlines
  5. Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.

    516 U.S. 479 (1996)   Cited 492 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding citizens cannot recover costs for past cleanup efforts under RCRA
  6. Rocovich v. Consol Edison Co.

    78 N.Y.2d 509 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 1,689 times
    Holding that "[i]t is an accepted rule that all parts of a statute are intended to be given effect and that a statutory construction which renders one part meaningless should be avoided"
  7. Alfred L. Snapp Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico

    458 U.S. 592 (1982)   Cited 529 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state has a legally protectable interest in enforcing its legal code
  8. William J. Jenack Estate Appraisers & Auctioneers, Inc. v. Rabizadeh

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 8373 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 466 times

    2013-12-17 WILLIAM J. JENACK ESTATE APPRAISERS AND AUCTIONEERS, INC., Appellant, v. Albert RABIZADEH, Respondent. Ostrer & Hoovler, P.C., Chester (Benjamin Ostrer and Cynthia Dolan of counsel), for appellant. Michael S. Winokur, Flushing, for respondent. RIVERA Ostrer & Hoovler, P.C., Chester (Benjamin Ostrer and Cynthia Dolan of counsel), for appellant. Michael S. Winokur, Flushing, for respondent. Cahill Partners LLP, New York City (John R. Cahill and Ronald W. Adelman of counsel), for Sotheby's

  9. City of New York v. Federal Communications Commission

    486 U.S. 57 (1988)   Cited 222 times
    Finding that the FCC's adoption of "regulations that establish technical standards to govern the quality of cable television signals" pre-empted local signal quality standards
  10. Porter v. Warner Co.

    328 U.S. 395 (1946)   Cited 732 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a separate cause of action for damages was enough to preclude courts from inferring that remedy elsewhere
  11. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,711 times   314 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  12. Section 78a - Short title

    15 U.S.C. § 78a   Cited 1,719 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Emphasizing considerations of federalism in SLUSA's legislative findings
  13. Section 77t - Injunctions and prosecution of offenses

    15 U.S.C. § 77t   Cited 1,396 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Granting the SEC the power to seek civil penalties for violations of the Securities Act
  14. Section 78bb - Effect on existing law

    15 U.S.C. § 78bb   Cited 903 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Adopting definition of "covered security" found in paragraphs and of section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933
  15. Section 77r - Exemption from State regulation of securities offerings

    15 U.S.C. § 77r   Cited 201 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing state authority to regulate offerings of securities that are completely intra-state
  16. Section 353 - Action by attorney-general

    N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 353   Cited 67 times

    1. Whenever the attorney-general shall believe from evidence satisfactory to him that any person, partnership, corporation, company, trust or association has engaged in, is engaged or is about to engage in any of the practices or transactions heretofore referred to as and declared to be fraudulent practices, he may bring an action in the name and on behalf of the people of the state of New York against such person, partnership, corporation, company, trust or association, and any other person or persons

  17. Section 720 - Actions against directors, officers and key persons

    N.Y. Not-For-Profit Corp. Law § 720   Cited 24 times
    Explaining that an action under Section 720 may be brought by the Attorney General or the corporation as well as by directors, officers, receivers, trustees in bankruptcy, and other enumerated parties
  18. Section 353-A - Receivers

    N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 353-A   Cited 23 times

    In any action brought by the attorney-general as provided in this article, the court at any stage of the proceedings may appoint a receiver of any and all property derived by the defendant or defendants or any of them by means of any such fraudulent practices, including also all property with which such property has been mingled if such property can not be identified in kind because of such commingling, together with any or all books of account and papers relating to the same. The judgment entered