§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of the Honorable Alan M. Simon, a Justice of the Spring Valley Village Court and the Ramapo Town Court, Rockland County, Petitioner, State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Respondent.

Brief

26 Cited authorities

  1. Matter of Jung

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8155 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 51 times
    In Matter of Jung (11 NY3d 365) the Court of Appeals held that trial courts should insure that incarcerated litigants have a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

  2. Affronti v. Crosson

    95 N.Y.2d 713 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 59 times
    Taking judicial notice of document taken from public records

  3. In the Matter of Watson

    100 N.Y.2d 290 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 18 times
    Considering but rejecting First Amendment challenge to 22 N.Y.C.R.R. § 100.5(d)'s ban on the making of "pledges or promises" by judicial candidates

  4. In the Matter of Bauer

    3 N.Y.3d 158 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 15 times

    125. Argued September 13, 2004. Decided October 14, 2004. Proceeding, pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 22 and Judiciary Law § 44, to review a determination of respondent State Commission on Judicial Conduct, dated March 30, 2004. The Commission determined that petitioner should be removed from the office of Judge of the Troy City Court, Rensselaer County. Roche, Corrigan, McCoy Bush, Albany ( Robert P. Roche of counsel), for petitioner. Robert H. Tembeckjian, New York City, Cathleen S.

  5. In the Matter of Mason

    100 N.Y.2d 56 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 16 times

    53 Decided May 1, 2003. Proceeding, pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 22 and Judiciary Law § 44, to review a determination of respondent State Commission on Judicial Conduct, dated June 21, 2002, that petitioner was guilty of misconduct and should be removed from the office of Justice of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial District. Paul T. Gentile, for petitioner. Gerald Stern, for respondent. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur

  6. Matter of Duckman

    92 N.Y.2d 141 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 21 times
    Rejecting argument that "actual impartiality" counteracted any perceived biases

  7. In re Raab

    100 N.Y.2d 305 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 14 times
    Upholding endorsement clause because provision "restricts a judge or judicial candidate from publicly endorsing other candidates for public office; it does not restrict speech concerning disputed political issues."

  8. Matter of Blackburne

    851 N.E.2d 1175 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 11 times

    No. 70. Argued May 2, 2006. Decided June 13, 2006. PROCEEDING, pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 22 and Judiciary Law § 44, to review a determination of respondent State Commission on Judicial Conduct, dated November 18, 2005. The Commission determined that petitioner should be removed from the office of Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County. Godosky Gentile, P.C., New York City ( David M. Godosky and Richard Godosky of counsel), for petitioner. I. This Court exercises plenary and

  9. In re Restaino

    10 N.Y.3d 577 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 9 times

    Argued April 22, 2008. decided June 5, 2008. PROCEEDING, pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 22 and Judiciary Law § 44, to review a determination of respondent State Commission on Judicial Conduct, dated November 13, 2007. The Commission determined that petitioner should be removed from the office of Judge of the Niagara Falls City Court, Niagara County. Connors Vilardo, LLP, Buffalo ( Terrence M. Connors and Vincent E. Doyle III of counsel), for petitioner. I. This Court should determine

  10. In re Labombard

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 7990 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 8 times

    No. 151. Argued September 9, 2008. Decided October 23, 2008. PROCEEDING, pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 22 and Judiciary Law § 44, to review a determination of respondent State Commission on Judicial Conduct, dated December 12, 2007. The Commission determined that petitioner should be removed from the office of Justice of the Ellenburg Town Court, Clinton County. Peter A. Dumas, Malone, for petitioner. It is a mischaracterization to describe the actions of petitioner as a "pattern of

  11. Section 7000.6 - Procedure upon a formal written complaint

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 7000.6   Cited 9 times

    (a) Applicable law. If the commission determines that a hearing is warranted, the procedures to be followed are those set forth in section 44, subdivision 4, of the Judiciary Law. (b) Answer. A judge who is served with a formal written complaint shall serve a verified answer within 20 days of service . The answer shall contain denials of those factual allegations known or believed to be untrue. The answer shall also specify those factual allegations as to the truth of which the judge lacks knowledge