19 Cited authorities

  1. Boykin v. Alabama

    395 U.S. 238 (1969)   Cited 11,693 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding defendant must have "a full understanding of what the plea connotes and its consequences "
  2. Brady v. United States

    397 U.S. 742 (1970)   Cited 6,258 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a voluntary plea of guilty intelligently made in the light of the then applicable law does not become vulnerable because later judicial decisions indicate that the plea rested on a faulty premise"
  3. Santobello v. New York

    404 U.S. 257 (1971)   Cited 4,476 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if petitioner is granted specific performance he "should be resentenced by a different judge"
  4. People v. Harris

    61 N.Y.2d 9 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 1,610 times
    In People v Harris (61 N.Y.2d 9), within the context of determining whether a guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, the Court of Appeals concluded that no mandatory catechism was required.
  5. People v. Nixon

    21 N.Y.2d 338 (N.Y. 1967)   Cited 508 times
    In People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, 355, 287 N.Y.S.2d 659, 234 N.E.2d 687 (1967), we renounced what we referred to as “the catechism system” for taking guilty pleas.
  6. People v. Rogers

    48 N.Y.2d 167 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 340 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Rogers, the New York Court of Appeals held that where an arrestee is represented by counsel on an unrelated charge, and counsel orders the police to cease their questioning, the arrestee may not be questioned further unless counsel is present. 48 N.Y.2d at 169.
  7. People v. Boston

    75 N.Y.2d 585 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 129 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Boston, defendant purported to waive indictment to attempted depraved indifference murder after he had been indicted for intentional murder and related offenses and without any felony complaint having been filed with respect to the new charge.
  8. People v. Fuggazzatto

    62 N.Y.2d 862 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 124 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In People v. Fuggazzatto (62 N.Y.2d 862), two indictments were filed simultaneously and were therefore subject to identical time periods for the People to announce their readiness for trial under CPL 30.30.
  9. People v. Taylor

    598 N.E.2d 693 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 95 times
    Describing requirements for admission of past recollections recorded
  10. People v. Clark

    45 N.Y.2d 432 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 128 times
    In People v. Clark (45 N.Y.2d 432, supra), the court held that statements made by defendant at a police station approximately one hour after he had informed a police officer that he did not wish to answer questions without the assistance of counsel were inadmissible. The court stated (supra, p 439): "With respect to the statements the defendant made at the police station the trial court found they were admissible because the defendant had not been coerced.
  11. Section 220.16 - Criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree

    N.Y. Penal Law § 220.16   Cited 1,190 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In New York Penal Law § 220.16, thirteen subsections set out in the disjunctive define when a "[a] person is guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree."
  12. Section 220.39 - Criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree

    N.Y. Penal Law § 220.39   Cited 932 times   2 Legal Analyses

    A person is guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree when he knowingly and unlawfully sells: 1. a narcotic drug; or 2. a stimulant, hallucinogen, hallucinogenic substance, or lysergic acid diethylamide and has previously been convicted of an offense defined in article two hundred twenty or the attempt or conspiracy to commit any such offense; or 3. a stimulant and the stimulant weighs one gram or more; or 4. lysergic acid diethylamide and the lysergic acid diethylamide

  13. Section 105.15 - Conspiracy in the second degree

    N.Y. Penal Law § 105.15   Cited 209 times

    A person is guilty of conspiracy in the second degree when, with intent that conduct constituting a class A felony be performed, he agrees with one or more persons to engage in or cause the performance of such conduct. Conspiracy in the second degree is a class B felony. N.Y. Penal Law § 105.15

  14. Section 220.44 - Criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds

    N.Y. Penal Law § 220.44   Cited 59 times

    A person is guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds when he knowingly and unlawfully sells: 1. a controlled substance in violation of any one of subdivisions one through six-a of section 220.34 of this article, when such sale takes place upon school grounds or on a school bus; or 2. a controlled substance in violation of any one of subdivisions one through eight of section 220.39 of this article, when such sale takes place upon school grounds or on a school bus;