15 Cited authorities

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. v. Benjamin

    328 U.S. 408 (1946)   Cited 299 times
    Holding that the McCarran Act expressly authorizes states to regulate and tax the business of insurance, even where such regulation and taxation might burden interstate commerce
  2. Osborn v. Ozlin

    310 U.S. 53 (1940)   Cited 123 times
    Holding that "questions of policy" under state insurance regulations are "not for us to judge"
  3. O'Gorman Young v. Hartf'd Ins. Co.

    282 U.S. 251 (1931)   Cited 158 times
    Upholding prohibition of “unreasonable” insurance commissions
  4. Assoc. for Retarded Citizens v. Dept. of Devt'l Serv

    38 Cal.3d 384 (Cal. 1985)   Cited 92 times
    Recognizing that administrative bodies "may spend no more money to provide services than the Legislature has appropriated"
  5. California Auto. Assn. v. Maloney

    341 U.S. 105 (1951)   Cited 78 times
    Upholding state statute requiring insurers to participate in a mandatory assigned-risk pool to assure the availability of automobile insurance
  6. Research Group v. Dept of Ins

    66 N.Y.2d 444 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 56 times

    Argued November 14, 1985 Decided December 19, 1985 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, John G. Connor, J. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin, Robert Hermann and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for appellant. Lewis B. Oliver, Jr., and Harriet B. Oliver for respondents. MEYER, J. The use in regulations promulgated by the Superintendent of Insurance pursuant to Insurance Law § 2329 of aggregate industry data rather than the individual

  7. Montgomery Ward v. Imperial Casualty Indemnity

    81 Cal.App.4th 356 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding horizontal exhaustion of SIRs not to be required before excess coverage is triggered
  8. Monarch Consulting, Inc. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh

    123 A.D.3d 51 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 11 times

    652366/10, 651960/11, 102187/11 09-11-2014 In re MONARCH CONSULTING, INC., et al., Petitioners–Appellants. v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., Respondent–Respondent. In re National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA., Petitioner–Respondent, v. Priority Business Services, Inc., formerly known as Inland Valley Staffing Services, etc., Respondent–Appellant. In re National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA., Petitioner–Appellant, v. Source One Staffing

  9. Miller-Wohl Co. v. Commissioner of Labor & Industry

    694 F.2d 203 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that because "[a]n amicus curiae is not a party to litigation," courts will "rarely" give "party prerogatives to those not formal parties"
  10. Am. Zurich Ins. Co. v. Country Villa Serv. Corp.

    2:14-cv-03779-RSWL-AS (C.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2015)   Cited 4 times

    2:14-cv-03779-RSWL-AS 07-09-2015 AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTRY VILLA SERVICE CORP. dba COUNTRY VILLA HEALTH SERVICES, Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIMS and THIRD PARTY ACTIONS HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW Senior U.S. District Judge ORDER re: Country Villa's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [75] Currently before the Court is Defendant/Counterclaimant Country Villa Service Corp.'s ("Country Villa") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

  11. Section 11658

    Cal. Ins. Code § 11658   Cited 34 times   5 Legal Analyses

    (a) A workers' compensation insurance policy or endorsement shall not be issued by an insurer to any person in this state unless the insurer files a copy of the form or endorsement with the rating organization pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 11750.3 and 30 days have expired from the date the form or endorsement is received by the commissioner from the rating organization without notice from the commissioner, unless the commissioner gives written approval of the form or endorsement prior to

  12. Section 1

    Cal. Ins. Code § 1   Cited 29 times
    In Elkins 1, the key issue, resolved adversely to Elkins, was "whether [Haire] breached her obligation to pay [Elkins'] any attorney fees owed him under paragraphs 12 and 15 of the retention agreement and, more specifically, whether at the time of [Elkins'] demand letter of December 2004, there had been—or even was thereafter—any determination of the 'fair market value' of her interest in the Haire Ranch."
  13. Section 2218 - Workers' Compensation Forms and Rates

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10 § 2218   Cited 5 times

    (a) Workers' compensation policy forms, endorsement forms, or ancillary agreements that are submitted to the Insurance Commissioner are excluded from the requirements of Sections 2204, 2205, 2216 and 2217 of these regulations. Sections 2250 et seq. govern the submission, approval and use of workers' compensation policy forms, endorsement forms, ancillary agreements, and notices. (b) Workers' compensation rates shall be filed as provided in Sections 2509.30 et seq. of this chapter. Cal. Code Regs