§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Talib W. Abdur-Rashid, Appellant,v.New York City Police Department, et al., Respondents.--------------------------------In the Matter of Samir Hashmi, Appellant, v. New York City Police Department, et al., Respondents.

Brief

19 Cited authorities

  1. Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Corp.

    429 U.S. 252 (1977)   Cited 4,278 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs need show only that "a discriminatory purpose has been a motivating factor in the decision," because, after all, "[r]arely can it be said that a legislature or administrative body operating under a broad mandate made a decision motivated solely by a single concern, or even that a particular purpose was the ‘dominant’ or ‘primary’ one."

  2. Hayden v. Paterson

    594 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2010)   Cited 1,624 times
    Holding that the race-neutral reenactment of a state constitution's felon disenfranchisement provision erased the discriminatory taint of earlier enactments

  3. Chavez v. Illinois State Police

    251 F.3d 612 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 2,075 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding there is no respondent superior or "supervisor liability" under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

  4. Department of Navy v. Egan

    484 U.S. 518 (1988)   Cited 518 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "unless Congress specifically has provided otherwise," "outside nonexpert bod[ies]," including courts, cannot attempt to substitute their judgments for those of the executive branch on matters of national security

  5. De Canas v. Bica

    424 U.S. 351 (1976)   Cited 473 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a California law prohibiting an employer from knowingly employing an illegal alien was not unconstitutional as a regulation of immigration or as being preempted under the Supremacy Clause

  6. Brown v. City of Oneonta

    221 F.3d 329 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 657 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because Section 1986 provides a cause of action for failure to prevent a Section 1985 conspiracy, in the absence of a cognizable Section 1985 claim, there can be no Section 1986 action

  7. United States v. Carolene Products Co.

    304 U.S. 144 (1938)   Cited 1,276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if "the question is at least debatable" as to whether a classification has a rational basis under an equal protection analysis, the courts are bound to uphold the classification

  8. Hassan v. City of N.Y.

    804 F.3d 277 (3d Cir. 2015)   Cited 157 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a defendant's "assertion that allegations of overt hostility and prejudice are required to make out claims under the First Amendment" "easily fail"

  9. Yick Wo v. Hopkins

    118 U.S. 356 (1886)   Cited 3,047 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding enforcement of a California ordinance—governing the use of wooden buildings as laundromats—solely against Chinese owners violated the Equal Protection Clause

  10. Floyd v. City of N.Y.

    959 F. Supp. 2d 540 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)   Cited 125 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding New York City's "stop-and-frisk" program unconstitutional under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments because of its reliance on racial profiling against Black and Latino men

  11. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,152 times   556 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party

  12. Section 413 - Transferred

    50 U.S.C. § 413   Cited 9 times

    50 U.S.C. § 413 EDITORIAL NOTES CODIFICATIONSection 413, comprising section 501 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3091 of this title.

  13. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation

  14. Section 3a.11 - Classification of official information

    18 C.F.R. § 3a.11

    (a)Security Classification Categories. Information or material which requires protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interest of the national defense or foreign relations of the United States (hereinafter collectively termed national security) is classified Top Secret, Secret or Confidential, depending upon the degree of its significance to national security. No other categories are to be used to identify official information or material requiring protection in the interest of national