§Why CasetextPricing

Grossmont Union High School Districts Opposition To Petitioners Supplemental Petition For Writ of Administrative Mandamus

Opposition

35 Cited authorities

  1. Fukuda v. City of Angels

    20 Cal.4th 805 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 461 times
    In Fukuda v. City of Angels (1999) 20 Cal.4th 805, 817, 818, the Supreme Court explained that, in the "weight of the evidence" test applicable under "independent judgment review," there is "a strong presumption of correctness concerning the administrative findings" which "provides the trial court with a starting point for review-but it is only a presumption, and may be overcome.

  2. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. Cty of Los Angeles

    11 Cal.3d 506 (Cal. 1974)   Cited 459 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Construing requirements of Gov. Code, § 65906 for zoning variances

  3. Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach

    48 Cal.App.4th 1152 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 140 times
    Finding City "violated state law by failing to provide a fair hearing . . . [but] did not offend the federal Constitution, on either procedural or substantive due process grounds"

  4. Cassidy v. California Board of Accountancy

    220 Cal.App.4th 620 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 76 times

    G046663 2014-01-21 Carl Randolf CASSIDY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY, Defendant and Respondent. See 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Extraordinary Writs, § 273 et seq. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Andrew P. Banks, Judge. Affirmed. (Super. Ct. No. 30–2011–00466661) IKOLA See 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Extraordinary Writs, § 273 et seq. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Andrew P. Banks

  5. Morrison v. State Board of Education

    1 Cal.3d 214 (Cal. 1969)   Cited 266 times
    Holding that the Board of Education could not characterize the petitioner's conduct as immoral or unprofessional and revoke his teaching certificate unless the conduct indicated he was unfit to teach

  6. Doe v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal.

    5 Cal.App.5th 1055 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 60 times
    Rejecting claim of error in an administrative hearing where the petitioner did not show prejudice

  7. Board of Education v. Jack M.

    19 Cal.3d 691 (Cal. 1977)   Cited 108 times
    In Jack M., we held that since a fitness hearing is guaranteed to convicted persons by statute, the denial of such a hearing to an unconvicted person would violate equal protection.

  8. San Diego Unified Sch. v. Commn On Profl

    194 Cal.App.4th 1454 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 34 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. D057740. April 4, 2011. Appeal from the Superior Court of San Diego County, No. 37-2009-00093780-CU-WM-CTL, Steven R. Denton, Judge. Jose A. Gonzales and Mark Bresee for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Defendant and Respondent. Tosdal, Smith, Steiner Wax and Fern Steiner for Real Party in Interest and Respondent. OPINION NARES, Acting P. J. Frank Lampedusa, a tenured teacher with the San Diego Unified School District (District) and the real party in interest in the matter, appealed

  9. Landau v. Superior Court

    81 Cal.App.4th 191 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 40 times

    Nos. A075493 A075251 Filed January 12, 1998 Opinion Certified for Partial Publication Review granted April 15, 1998. Review was dismissed on June 14, 2000, and the opinion was directed to be partially published. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b)and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts III, IV and VI. Appeal from San Francisco Superior Court, No. 976845, Honorable William Cahill, Judge. Tanke Willemsen, Tony J. Tanke and Gary L. Simms, for

  10. Pinheiro v. Civil Serv. Comm'n for the Cnty. of Fresno

    245 Cal.App.4th 1458 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses

    F070473 03-29-2016 John PINHEIRO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., Defendants and Respondents. Motschiedler, Michaelides, Wishon, Brewer & Ryan and Russell K. Ryan, Fresno, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Daniel C. Cederborg, County Counsel, and Catherine E. Basham, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents. GOMES, Acting P.J. Motschiedler, Michaelides, Wishon, Brewer & Ryan and Russell K. Ryan, Fresno, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Daniel