§Why CasetextPricing

Guerra vs Ncrc Inc

Motion Other

28 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

    563 U.S. 333 (2011)   Cited 3,886 times   602 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"

  2. Moses H. Cone Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp.

    460 U.S. 1 (1983)   Cited 12,119 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding stay order appealable under § 1291 where it put the litigant "effectively out of court," and "surrender[ed] jurisdiction of a federal suit to a state court"

  3. Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeds Intr.

    559 U.S. 662 (2010)   Cited 1,699 times   211 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prudential ripeness argument was waived

  4. Green Tree Fin. Corp.-Ala. v. Randolph

    531 U.S. 79 (2000)   Cited 2,437 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claims under the Truth in Lending Act are arbitrable

  5. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd

    470 U.S. 213 (1985)   Cited 3,394 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the word "shall" in a separate section of the FAA constituted a mandate to the district court

  6. Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 83 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 1,799 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding unilateral arbitration provision substantively unconscionable

  7. Fitz v. NCR Corp.

    118 Cal.App.4th 702 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 233 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an incorporated AAA discovery rule was deliberately hidden by a conflicting discovery provision in the arbitration agreement

  8. Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue Cross of California

    83 Cal.App.4th 677 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 216 times
    Holding claim for negligent interference with prospective economic advantage and other tort and statutory claims constituted disputes "arising under" the parties' agreement where those claims "center[ed] around and [were] clearly based upon" terms in the agreement and were "inextricably related to [the agreement's] terms and provisions"

  9. Wagner Construction Co. v. Pacific Mechanical Corp.

    41 Cal.4th 19 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 139 times
    Holding that, under California law, doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues must be resolved in favor of arbitration

  10. Rowe v. Exline

    153 Cal.App.4th 1276 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 135 times
    Holding nonsignatories entitled to compel signatory to arbitrate under equitable estoppel when signatory’s claims are inherently inseparable from or intertwined with arbitrable claims

  11. Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title

    9 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 12,138 times   211 Legal Analyses
    Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself

  12. Section 4 - Failure to arbitrate under agreement; petition to United States court having jurisdiction for order to compel arbitration; notice and service thereof; hearing and determination

    9 U.S.C. § 4   Cited 6,558 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to federal courts to compel party to participate in arbitration where a valid arbitration agreement exists

  13. Section 1281.2 - Grounds for not ordering parties to arbitrate controversy

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1281.2   Cited 1,453 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Stating that an order compelling arbitration “may not be refused on the ground that the petitioner's contentions lack substantive merit”

  14. Section 1280 - Definitions

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1280   Cited 815 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining drafting party

  15. Section 1281 - Generally

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1281   Cited 520 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Explaining an arbitration agreement may only be invalidated upon the same "grounds as exist for the revocation of any contract"