16 Cited authorities

U.S. v. Ritchie
342 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 3,642 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a court may consider "certain materials—documents attached to the complaint, documents incorporated by reference in the complaint, or matters of judicial notice—without converting the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment"
Swartz v. KPMG LLP
476 F.3d 756 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 2,853 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that “[t]o the extent Swartz seeks a declaration of defendants' liability for damages sought for his other causes of action,” claim must be dismissed as “merely duplicative”
Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.
899 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2018) Cited 1,364 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court erred in concluding that challenged statement was not actionable in light of what defendants argued was a prior disclosure where "it was far from obvious" that reasonable minds could not differ as to the adequacy of the prior disclosure
Kushner v. Beverly Enterprises, Inc.
317 F.3d 820 (8th Cir. 2003) Cited 318 times
Holding that an allegation that someone involved in a fraudulent scheme reported to one of the named defendants was "not specific enough to support a strong inference that [the defendant] knew of or participated in the fraudulent practice while it was occurring"
Ruiz v. City of Santa Maria
160 F.3d 543 (9th Cir. 1998) Cited 149 times
Holding that for purposes of vote dilution claim, minority's "preferred candidate" need not be a member of the racial minority.
Newman v. San Joaquin Delta Community College District
272 F.R.D. 505 (E.D. Cal. 2011) Cited 49 times
Approving schedule of ten hour examination split over two days
Pratt v. Hedrick
No. C 13-4557 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015) Cited 23 times
No. C 13-4557 SI (pr) 06-23-2015 RYANT T. PRATT, Plaintiff, v. B. HEDRICK; et al., Defendants. SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS INTRODUCTION Ryant T. Pratt filed this pro se prisoner's civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that his right to due process had been violated because the evidence was insufficient to support a prison disciplinary decision against him. Defendants now move to dismiss the action as barred by the Heck rule because the
Pina v. Henderson
752 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1985) Cited 66 times
Holding that the existence and content of a police report are not properly the subject of judicial notice
Pa. Dep't of Human Servs. v. United States
897 F.3d 497 (3d Cir. 2018) Cited 11 times
Providing " court may take judicial notice of an adjudicative fact if that fact is not subject to reasonable dispute"
Rezentes v. Sears, Roebuck Co.
729 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (D. Haw. 2010) Cited 19 times
Finding that firing an employee because of honesty and integrity concerns is a legitimate, nondiscriminatory basis for termination
Section 841 - Prohibited acts A
21 U.S.C. § 841 Cited 90,590 times 145 Legal Analyses
In § 841 prosecutions, then, it is the fact that the doctor issued an unauthorized prescription that renders his or her conduct wrongful, not the fact of the dispensation itself.
Section 860 - Distribution or manufacturing in or near schools and colleges
21 U.S.C. § 860 Cited 1,224 times 4 Legal Analyses
Enhancing penalties because § 841 offense was committed near school

Cross et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

16 Cited authorities

Holding that a court may consider "certain materials—documents attached to the complaint, documents incorporated by reference in the complaint, or matters of judicial notice—without converting the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment"

Holding that “[t]o the extent Swartz seeks a declaration of defendants' liability for damages sought for his other causes of action,” claim must be dismissed as “merely duplicative”

Holding that the district court erred in concluding that challenged statement was not actionable in light of what defendants argued was a prior disclosure where "it was far from obvious" that reasonable minds could not differ as to the adequacy of the prior disclosure

Holding that an allegation that someone involved in a fraudulent scheme reported to one of the named defendants was "not specific enough to support a strong inference that [the defendant] knew of or participated in the fraudulent practice while it was occurring"

Holding that for purposes of vote dilution claim, minority's "preferred candidate" need not be a member of the racial minority.

Approving schedule of ten hour examination split over two days

Holding that the existence and content of a police report are not properly the subject of judicial notice

Providing " court may take judicial notice of an adjudicative fact if that fact is not subject to reasonable dispute"

Finding that firing an employee because of honesty and integrity concerns is a legitimate, nondiscriminatory basis for termination

In § 841 prosecutions, then, it is the fact that the doctor issued an unauthorized prescription that renders his or her conduct wrongful, not the fact of the dispensation itself.

Enhancing penalties because § 841 offense was committed near school