47 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 251,520 times 279 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 27,728 times 138 Legal Analyses
Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Gonzaga University v. Doe
536 U.S. 273 (2002) Cited 3,195 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that nothing "short of an unambiguously conferred right ... support a cause of action brought under § 1983"
Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
463 U.S. 85 (1983) Cited 3,509 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that federal common law of ERISA preempts state law in the interpretation of ERISA benefit plans
Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
397 U.S. 137 (1970) Cited 1,700 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding that where a statute addresses "a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental, it will be upheld unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits"
Oregon Waste Sys., Inc. v. Dep. of Envt'l Qual. of Ore
511 U.S. 93 (1994) Cited 687 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that a greater surcharge on disposal of in-state waste than on disposal of out-of-state waste facially discriminated against interstate commerce
Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transp. Ass'n
552 U.S. 364 (2008) Cited 387 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that targeted ground carrier regulations were pre-empted by a statute modeled on the ADA
American Trucking v. City of Los Angeles
559 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2009) Cited 1,262 times
Holding plaintiff seeking injunction "not entitled to relief" in absence of showing "likelihood of irreparable harm"
Dept. Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis
553 U.S. 328 (2008) Cited 298 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a discriminatory state law is “virtually per se invalid” and “will survive only if it advances a legitimate local purpose that cannot be adequately served by reasonable nondiscriminatory alternatives”
Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Co.
339 U.S. 667 (1950) Cited 1,865 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding Congress enlarged the range of available federal court remedies, not jurisdiction, under the DJA because "[i]t is well-settled that the [DJA] cannot serve as an independent basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction"
Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Cited 485,185 times 688 Legal Analyses
Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation
Section 1331 - Federal question
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Cited 97,061 times 133 Legal Analyses
Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."
Section 14501 - Federal authority over intrastate transportation
49 U.S.C. § 14501 Cited 676 times 31 Legal Analyses
Granting a limited exemption to a state or its political subdivisions from the federally preempted regulation of the towing industry by permitting a state or its political subdivisions to regulate nonconsent tow fees
Section 5125 - Preemption
49 U.S.C. § 5125 Cited 67 times 4 Legal Analyses
Authorizing the Secretary of Transportation to decide whether a state or local statute that conflicts with the regulation of hazardous waste transportation is pre-empted
Section 31141 - Review and preemption of State laws and regulations
49 U.S.C. § 31141 Cited 38 times 8 Legal Analyses
Providing that the remedies "are in addition to other remedies provided by law"

California Trucking Association et al v. Becerra et al

47 Cited authorities

Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

Holding that nothing "short of an unambiguously conferred right ... support a cause of action brought under § 1983"

Holding that federal common law of ERISA preempts state law in the interpretation of ERISA benefit plans

Holding that where a statute addresses "a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental, it will be upheld unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits"

Holding that a greater surcharge on disposal of in-state waste than on disposal of out-of-state waste facially discriminated against interstate commerce

Holding that targeted ground carrier regulations were pre-empted by a statute modeled on the ADA

Holding plaintiff seeking injunction "not entitled to relief" in absence of showing "likelihood of irreparable harm"

Holding that a discriminatory state law is “virtually per se invalid” and “will survive only if it advances a legitimate local purpose that cannot be adequately served by reasonable nondiscriminatory alternatives”

Holding Congress enlarged the range of available federal court remedies, not jurisdiction, under the DJA because "[i]t is well-settled that the [DJA] cannot serve as an independent basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction"

Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation

Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."

Granting a limited exemption to a state or its political subdivisions from the federally preempted regulation of the towing industry by permitting a state or its political subdivisions to regulate nonconsent tow fees

Authorizing the Secretary of Transportation to decide whether a state or local statute that conflicts with the regulation of hazardous waste transportation is pre-empted

Providing that the remedies "are in addition to other remedies provided by law"