All State & Fed.
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories
REPLY to Response to Motion re Motion to Adopt Modified Trial Management Plan
Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.
517 U.S. 370 (1996)
Cited 5,295 times
64 Legal Analyses
Holding that claim construction is a matter of law for the court
Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
574 U.S. 318 (2015)
Cited 1,194 times
67 Legal Analyses
Holding that, where no subsidiary factual dispute exists, appellate court reviews district court's construction of patent de novo
Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
572 U.S. 663 (2014)
Cited 484 times
64 Legal Analyses
Holding that laches is not a defense to damages for copyright infringement
Tull v. United States
481 U.S. 412 (1987)
Cited 1,000 times
19 Legal Analyses
Holding a party had a right to trial by jury in civil claims brought by the government
Teamsters v. Terry
494 U.S. 558 (1990)
Cited 837 times
5 Legal Analyses
Holding that a breach of a collective bargaining agreement is most analogous to a "breach of contract claim"
SCA Hygiene Prods. Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Prods., LLC
137 S. Ct. 954 (2017)
Cited 198 times
27 Legal Analyses
Holding that laches cannot be invoked as a defense against a claim for patent infringement damages brought within the 35 U.S.C. § 286 six-year limitations period
Gucci Am., Inc. v. Bank of China
768 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2014)
Cited 322 times
7 Legal Analyses
Holding that court has no general personal jurisdiction over a bank where it "has branch offices in the forum, but is incorporated and headquartered elsewhere"
Samsung Elecs. Co. v. Apple Inc.
137 S. Ct. 429 (2016)
Cited 52 times
17 Legal Analyses
Upholding as definite the phrase "substantially centered"
American Calcar v. American Honda Motor Co.
651 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
Cited 123 times
1 Legal Analyses
Finding that the term "in response to" connotes that the second events occurs in reaction to the first event."
Nike, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
138 F.3d 1437 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
Cited 127 times
3 Legal Analyses
Concluding "that the marking requirement, § 287, applies to design patents whether remedy for infringement is sought under § 284 or § 289."
Section 289 - Additional remedy for infringement of design patent
35 U.S.C. § 289
Cited 157 times
73 Legal Analyses
In 35 U.S.C. § 289 infringement is defined as unauthorized manufacture or sale of "the patented design, or any colorable imitation thereof".