§Why CasetextPricing

Hull v. Miller et al (TV2)

REPLY to Response to Motion re

3 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Arthur Young Co.

    465 U.S. 805 (1984)   Cited 477 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court may not circumscribe the broad authority granted the IRS by § 7602

  2. Rule 501 - Privilege in General

    Fed. R. Evid. 501   Cited 4,123 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "in a civil case, state law governs privilege regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision"

  3. Section 62-1-116 - Confidential information

    Tenn. Code § 62-1-116   Cited 8 times
    Describing the duty of licensed public accountants to keep information confidential