6 Cited authorities

St. Mary v. Superior Court
223 Cal.App.4th 762 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014) Cited 63 times
Noting that under section 2033.280, "a propounding party must take affirmative steps—by bringing a formal 'deemed admitted' motion—to have RFAs to which timely responses are not received deemed admitted"
Garcia v. Hyster Co.
28 Cal.App.4th 724 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994) Cited 55 times
Holding that where detailed statutes did not expressly provide "for the award of costs in favor of a prevailing defendant against a plaintiff in intervention for any period preceding the filing of the complaint in intervention," such costs would not be allowed
Redwood Empire v. Gombos
82 Cal.App.4th 352 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000) Cited 19 times
Upholding a finding of implied public dedication of a one-lane dirt road in the Santa Cruz Mountains
Burke v. Superior Court
71 Cal.2d 276 (Cal. 1969) Cited 54 times
In Burke the defendant in an action on an attachment bond defended against a claim for the expenses incurred in winning the underlying action, by claiming, through denials, that the attachment could have been dissolved without winning the case on its merits.
Hillman v. Stults
263 Cal.App.2d 848 (Cal. Ct. App. 1968) Cited 41 times
In Hillman, a prison inmate filed an action seeking an accounting and to impress a trust upon property transferred to his sister.
Cembrook v. Superior Court
56 Cal.2d 423 (Cal. 1961) Cited 44 times
In Cembrook the defendant objected to approximately 40 requests for admissions of facts, moving to strike the requests and to be relieved of the necessity of providing any answer.

Reply To Opposition To Mtc Rfa

6 Cited authorities

St. Mary v. Superior Court

Noting that under section 2033.280, "a propounding party must take affirmative steps—by bringing a formal 'deemed admitted' motion—to have RFAs to which timely responses are not received deemed admitted"

Garcia v. Hyster Co.

Holding that where detailed statutes did not expressly provide "for the award of costs in favor of a prevailing defendant against a plaintiff in intervention for any period preceding the filing of the complaint in intervention," such costs would not be allowed

Redwood Empire v. Gombos

Upholding a finding of implied public dedication of a one-lane dirt road in the Santa Cruz Mountains

Burke v. Superior Court

In Burke the defendant in an action on an attachment bond defended against a claim for the expenses incurred in winning the underlying action, by claiming, through denials, that the attachment could have been dissolved without winning the case on its merits.

Hillman v. Stults

In Hillman, a prison inmate filed an action seeking an accounting and to impress a trust upon property transferred to his sister.

Cembrook v. Superior Court

In Cembrook the defendant objected to approximately 40 requests for admissions of facts, moving to strike the requests and to be relieved of the necessity of providing any answer.