27 Cited authorities

  1. Wilson & Wilson v. City Council of Redwood City

    191 Cal.App.4th 1559 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 205 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting as unripe claim regarding possible condemnation of property when the city had not yet committed to any action regarding the property
  2. Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal Com

    33 Cal.3d 158 (Cal. 1982)   Cited 355 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that case is not sufficiently ripe if "`[plaintiffs] are not immediately faced with the dilemma of either complying with the guidelines or risking penalties for violating them'"
  3. Ridgley v. Topa Thrift & Loan Ass'n

    17 Cal.4th 970 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 133 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the disputed provision was an unenforceable penalty for late payment of interest
  4. Bowen v. First Family Financial Serv., Inc.

    233 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2000)   Cited 116 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "perhaps or maybe chance" of future harm is "not enough" to establish standing for a claim seeking injunctive relief from an arbitration agreement
  5. Verdugo v. Target Corp.

    59 Cal.4th 312 (Cal. 2014)   Cited 62 times
    Holding that a retailer did not owe a common law duty to acquire and make available an AED to a patron
  6. Greentree Financial Group, Inc. v. Execute Sports, Inc.

    163 Cal.App.4th 495 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 61 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding the stipulated judgment amount for $45,000 constituted an unenforceable penalty where the underlying settlement was for $20,000
  7. Stonehouse Homes LLC v. City of Sierra Madre

    167 Cal.App.4th 531 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 59 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding unripe developer's declaratory judgment action challenging city resolution that merely directed committee to prepare recommendations for future legislation to amend zoning ordinance
  8. Vitatech Int'l, Inc. v. Sporn

    16 Cal.App.5th 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 34 times
    Concluding stipulated judgment that included unlawful liquidated damages provision was void
  9. Timney v. Lin

    106 Cal.App.4th 1121 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 55 times
    Interpreting approval of settlement under Cal. Code of Civ. Pro. § 664.6; approval by court does not immunize clause in settlement agreement that is otherwise illegal
  10. Otay Land Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.

    169 Cal.App.4th 556 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Otay, the plaintiff was an owner of real property who brought a declaratory relief action against the liability insurer of the property's former owner regarding the insurer's anticipated coverage with respect to contamination problems at the property.