31 Cited authorities

  1. Rent-A-Ctr. v. Jackson

    561 U.S. 63 (2010)   Cited 2,272 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an arbitration provision is severable from the remainder of the contract," even where the contract containing the arbitration provision is itself an arbitration agreement (quoting Buckeye , 546 U.S. at 445, 126 S.Ct. 1204 )
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.

    500 U.S. 20 (1991)   Cited 2,909 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994 ed.), may be subject to compulsory arbitration
  3. Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.

    539 U.S. 52 (2003)   Cited 454 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding the FAA applies to all transactions "affecting commerce-words of art that ordinarily signal the broadest permissible exercise of Congress' Commerce Clause power"
  4. Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 83 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 1,631 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Holding unilateral arbitration provision substantively unconscionable
  5. Rosenthal v. Great W. Fin. Secs. Corp.

    14 Cal.4th 394 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 708 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding fraud in the inducement "occurs when the promisor knows what he is signing but his consent is induced by fraud"
  6. Mercuro v. Superior Court

    96 Cal.App.4th 167 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding arbitration provision substantively unconscionable where it "compel[ed] arbitration of the claims employees are more likely to bring"
  7. Bruni v. Didion

    160 Cal.App.4th 1272 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 150 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs are not bound by Evid. Code, § 622 to a recital that they had read a sample copy of a warranty booklet"
  8. Hoover v. American Income Life Insurance Co.

    206 Cal.App.4th 1193 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 129 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the rights accorded by [Labor Code] sections 203, 1194, and 2802 may not be subject to negotiation or waiver .... For an arbitration clause to operate for individual statutory claims, there must be a clear and unmistakable waiver of a judicial forum."
  9. Lane v. Francis Capital Mgmt. LLC

    224 Cal.App.4th 676 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 121 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding failing to attach rules to arbitration agreement did not render the agreement procedurally unconscionable because rules were easily accessible on the internet and the plaintiff did not lack means or capacity to retrieve them
  10. Dotson v. Amgen, Inc.

    181 Cal.App.4th 975 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that "discovery limitations are an integral and permissible part of the arbitration process"