§Why CasetextPricing

Christina Acosta vs. Global Girls Rising

Opposition

5 Cited authorities

  1. Lackner v. North

    135 Cal.App.4th 1188 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 164 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ski resort has no duty to eliminate or protect a recreational skier from a collision with a participant in a snowboarding race and that the resort had no duty to supervise the race participants as they warmed up on a designated training run prior to a competition

  2. Scalf v. D.B. Log Homes, Inc.

    128 Cal.App.4th 1510 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the plaintiff's deposition testimony was not the equivalent of a judicial admission

  3. Midwest Television, Inc. v. Scott, Lancaster, Mills & Atha, Inc.

    205 Cal.App.3d 442 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)   Cited 37 times

    Docket No. B022198, October 25, 1988. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. C378886, Charles H. Older, Judge. COUNSEL Mark Brifman and Joann R. Deutch for Defendant and Appellant. Raoul Y. Roth for Plaintiffs and Respondents. OPINION KENNARD, J. Defendant advertising agency, Scott, Lancaster, Mills Atha, Inc., appeals from a judgment following a court trial in May 1986 rendering it liable for payment of delinquent accounts for air time run on plaintiff independent television stations

  4. Redwood Empire v. Gombos

    82 Cal.App.4th 352 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 19 times
    Upholding a finding of implied public dedication of a one-lane dirt road in the Santa Cruz Mountains

  5. Section 2033.300 - Withdrawal or amendment of admission

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2033.300   Cited 63 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Setting forth procedure and criteria for party to withdraw or amend admission