21 Cited authorities

  1. Allen v. City of Sacramento

    234 Cal.App.4th 41 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 402 times
    Holding allegation of "a wrongful arrest or detention, without more, does not" state a claim for violation of the Bane Act
  2. Reichardt v. Hoffman

    52 Cal.App.4th 754 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 622 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that absent an exceptional showing of good cause, an appellate court will not address issues raised for the first time in a reply brief
  3. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center

    6 Cal.4th 666 (Cal. 1993)   Cited 573 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to impose duty without requisite degree of foreseeability would force landlords to become insurers of public safety
  4. Katzberg v. Regents of the University of California

    29 Cal.4th 300 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 276 times
    Holding that an action for damages was not available to redress a freestanding claim pursuant to Article I, Section 7 of the California Constitution; the Bane Act was not discussed
  5. California Back Specialists Medical Group v. Rand

    160 Cal.App.4th 1032 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 64 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting contention "that the attorney fees award is invalid because the court did not comply with the procedural requirements of section 128.5"
  6. Virtanen v. O'Connell

    140 Cal.App.4th 688 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 63 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding sufficient allegations of conversion when property was taken from escrow “when none of the conditions to close [the escrow account] had been met”
  7. Standard Microsystems Corp. v. Winbond Electronics Corp.

    179 Cal.App.4th 868 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 47 times
    Granting relief from a judgment but not the underlying default would be a useless act
  8. Zimmerman, Rosenfeld, Gersh & Leeds v. Larson

    131 Cal.App.4th 1466 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 51 times

    No. B177971 August 17, 2005 Appeal from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BC300348, Joanne B. O'Donnell, Judge. Zimmerman, Rosenfeld, Gersh Leeds, Gary L. Zimmerman and Rochelle A. Herzog for Plaintiff and Appellant. Sievert, Young Donahoe, Richard D. Sievert and Mark T. Young for Defendant and Respondent. OPINION CURRY, J. Appellant, the law firm of Zimmerman, Rosenfeld, Gersh Leeds (ZRGL), brought suit against its former client, respondent Glen Larson, seeking payment of fees incurred

  9. Balboa Ins. Co. v. Aguirre

    149 Cal.App.3d 1002 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 45 times
    Construing former § 583
  10. Barton v. Khan

    157 Cal.App.4th 1216 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 14 times
    In Barton, the plaintiff attempted to amend his original complaint before the hearing on the individual defendants' first demurrer, not after a demurrer had been heard and decided.
  11. Rule 2.30 - Sanctions for rules violations in civil cases

    Cal. R. 2.30   Cited 34 times

    (a) Application This sanctions rule applies to the rules in the California Rules of Court relating to general civil cases, unlawful detainer cases, probate proceedings, civil proceedings in the appellate division of the superior court, and small claims cases. (b) Sanctions In addition to any other sanctions permitted by law, the court may order a person, after written notice and an opportunity to be heard, to pay reasonable monetary sanctions to the court or an aggrieved person, or both, for failure

  12. Rule 3.1322 - Motions to strike

    Cal. R. 3.1322   Cited 10 times

    (a) Contents of notice A notice of motion to strike a portion of a pleading must quote in full the portions sought to be stricken except where the motion is to strike an entire paragraph, cause of action, count, or defense. Specifications in a notice must be numbered consecutively. (b) Timing A notice of motion to strike must be given within the time allowed to plead, and if a demurrer is interposed, concurrently therewith, and must be noticed for hearing and heard at the same time as the demurrer