22 Cited authorities

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist.

    2 Cal.4th 962 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 1,196 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Aubry, supra, 42 Cal.App.4th 579 at pages 587 through 588, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 703, the court, citing language from Labor Council, held the Regents were not required to pay private contractors the prevailing wage under section 1770 et seq., which applies to public works, for the construction of student and staff housing.
  2. Saunders v. Superior Court

    27 Cal.App.4th 832 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 549 times
    Finding that aiding and abetting requires actual knowledge
  3. Doe v. City of Los Angeles

    42 Cal.4th 531 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 265 times
    Holding courts construing California statutes "may not broaden or narrow the scope of the provision by reading into it language that does not appear in it or reading out of it language that does."
  4. Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc.

    14 Cal.App.4th 612 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 385 times
    Holding that " demurrer for uncertainty is strictly construed, even where a complaint is in some respects uncertain, because ambiguities can be clarified under modern discovery procedures."
  5. Cansino v. Bank of America

    224 Cal.App.4th 1462 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 149 times
    Holding that a representation that a home would appreciate in value was a prediction about the future and thus could not support a fraud claim
  6. Hinesley v. Oakshade Town Center

    135 Cal.App.4th 289 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 141 times
    Holding that term in lease that disclaimed reliance on representations to contrary is factor to be considered in determining whether reliance on representations was justified and reasonable
  7. Stockton Mortgage, Inc. v. Tope

    233 Cal.App.4th 437 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 77 times
    Holding that speculation about the creation of a separate agreement is not evidence of a contract
  8. Stevens v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

    75 Cal.App.4th 594 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 70 times
    Holding that plaintiff may bring a claim under the UCL based on a violation of insurance licensing requirements because the statutes did not bar private enforcement
  9. Lickiss v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

    208 Cal.App.4th 1125 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 39 times
    In Lickiss, the court held the provisions of FINRA's distinct rule 2080 only govern the circumstances under which FINRA will waive its right to participate in third party judicial or arbitral proceedings involving customer disputes and in which expungement has been sought by a FINRA member; contrary to FINRA's contention in Lickiss, the waiver of notice and service standards set forth in rule 2080 do not govern the substantive principles of equity, which a court must apply in determining whether such expungement is appropriate.
  10. Martin Marietta Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America

    40 Cal.App.4th 1113 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 68 times
    Requiring coverage of actions against insured to remediate groundwater and other environmental contamination
  11. Section 430.10 - Grounds for objection by party against whom complaint or cross-complaint filed

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10   Cited 1,051 times
    Explaining "[t]he party against whom a complaint ... has been filed may object, by demurrer ..., to the pleading" on the basis that "[t]he pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action"
  12. Section 1174 - Judgment if verdict or findings of court in favor of plaintiff; action brought by petroleum distributor against gasoline dealer

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1174   Cited 169 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a court may issue a judgment for possession of the premises as a remedy for unlawful detainer
  13. Section 1951.2 - Recovery by lessor upon breach of lease and abandonment of property by lessee

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1951.2   Cited 113 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Specifying the damages available to a landlord upon the tenant's abandonment of a lease before the end of its term
  14. Section 1174.5 - Lessee not relieved from liability upon judgment declaring forfeiture of lease or agreement

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1174.5   Cited 10 times

    A judgment in unlawful detainer declaring the forfeiture of the lease or agreement under which real property is held shall not relieve the lessee from liability pursuant to Section 1951.2 of the Civil Code. Ca. Civ. Proc. Code § 1174.5 Added by Stats. 1982, Ch. 488, Sec. 1.

  15. Rule 2.251 - Electronic service

    Cal. R. 2.251   Cited 15 times

    (a)Authorization for electronic service When a document may be served by mail, express mail, overnight delivery, or fax transmission, the document may be served electronically under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6, Penal Code section 690.5, and the rules in this chapter. For purposes of electronic service made pursuant to Penal Code section 690.5, express consent to electronic service is required.[]= (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2022; previously amended effective January 1, 2007