39 Cited authorities

  1. Pennhurst State School Hosp. v. Halderman

    465 U.S. 89 (1984)   Cited 10,150 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts lack jurisdiction to enjoin "state institutions and state officials on the basis of" state law
  2. Central Hudson Gas Elec. v. Public Serv. Comm'n

    447 U.S. 557 (1980)   Cited 1,861 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a restriction on commercial speech must directly advance a substantial governmental interest
  3. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union

    521 U.S. 844 (1997)   Cited 845 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that anti-indecency provisions of the Communications Decency Act violated the First Amendment
  4. Houston v. Hill

    482 U.S. 451 (1987)   Cited 1,106 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment does not permit states to “provide the police with unfettered discretion to arrest individuals for words or conduct that annoy or offend them”
  5. Va. Pharmacy Bd. v. Va. Consumer Council

    425 U.S. 748 (1976)   Cited 1,613 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state statute banning the advertisement or dissemination of prescription drug price information by licensed pharmacists violates the First Amendment
  6. Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.

    564 U.S. 552 (2011)   Cited 343 times   59 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law restricting disclosure of pharmacy records violated First Amendment
  7. 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island

    517 U.S. 484 (1996)   Cited 453 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on advertising the alcohol content of malt beverages violated the First Amendment
  8. Edenfield v. Fane

    507 U.S. 761 (1993)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that restrictions on commercial speech "need only be tailored in a reasonable manner to serve a substantial state interest"
  9. Zwickler v. Koota

    389 U.S. 241 (1967)   Cited 981 times
    Holding that to abstain and thus "force the plaintiff who has commenced a federal action to suffer the delay of state court proceedings might itself effect the impermissible chilling of the very constitutional right he seeks to protect"
  10. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

    471 U.S. 626 (1985)   Cited 520 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that attorney advertisement promising "if there is no recovery, no legal fees are owed by our clients" was potentially misleading because "members of the public are often unaware of the technical meanings of such terms as `fees' and `costs' — terms that, in ordinary usage, might well be virtually interchangeable"
  11. Section 1602 - Definitions and rules of construction

    15 U.S.C. § 1602   Cited 1,680 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Granting Federal Reserve authority to issue rules to carry out the CARD Act
  12. Section 1045-J - Imposition and disposition of sewer and water fees, rates, rents or charges

    N.Y. Pub. Auth. Law § 1045-J   Cited 19 times
    Allowing the Water Board to “accept credit cards as a means of payment of fees, rates, rent or other charges,” and to impose “a reasonable administrative service fee not to exceed the costs incurred by the water board in connection with such credit card transaction.”
  13. Section 420.05 - Payment of fines, mandatory surcharges and fees by credit card

    N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 420.05   Cited 3 times

    When the court imposes a fine, mandatory surcharge or fee upon an individual who stands convicted of any offense, such individual may pay such fine, mandatory surcharge or fee by credit card or similar device. In such event, notwithstanding any other provision of law, he or she also may be required to pay a reasonable administrative fee. The amount of such administrative fee and the time and manner of its payment shall be in accordance with the system established by the chief administrator of the