4 Cited authorities

  1. In the Matter of Blackwell v. Goord

    5 A.D.3d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)   Cited 24 times

    93523. Decided March 11, 2004. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review two determinations finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. James Blackwell, Comstock, petitioner pro se. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), for respondents. Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Lahtinen, JJ. MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT CREW III, J. Petitioner

  2. In the Matter of Mitchell Kalwasinski v. Fischer

    87 A.D.3d 1207 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 8 times

    2011-09-22 In the Matter of Mitchell KALWASINSKI, Petitioner,v.Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent. Mitchell Kalwasinski, Romulus, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary

  3. Russell v. Selsky

    50 A.D.3d 1412 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 11 times

    No. 502974. April 24, 2008. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Jacob Russell, Auburn, petitioner pro se. Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent. Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain and Kavanagh, JJ. Lahtinen, J. Petitioner

  4. Matter of Victor v. Goord

    253 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 5 times

    September 17, 1998 Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged with and found guilty of possessing a weapon in violation of prison disciplinary rules after a razor blade was found secreted in his mouth. Petitioner challenges the determination of his guilt and we confirm. To the extent that petitioner raised an issue of substantial evidence, we conclude that the detailed misbehavior report, together with the corroborating unusual incident report, memoranda and testimony presented at the hearing, provide