§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of the Association for a Better Long Island, Inc., et al., Petitioners, Town of Riverhead et al., Appellants,v.New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, et al., Respondents.

Brief

14 Cited authorities

  1. Society of Plastics v. Suffolk

    77 N.Y.2d 761 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 958 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Society of Plastics Indus. v. County of Suffolk, 77 N.Y.2d 761, 570 N.Y.S.2d 778, 573 N.E.2d 1034 (1991), this Court examined the law of standing, and set forth a framework for deciding whether parties have standing to challenge governmental action in land use matters generally, and under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art. 8 [SEQRA]), specifically.

  2. Klostermann v. Cuomo

    61 N.Y.2d 525 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 407 times
    In Klostermann, the public agencies involved were in repeated noncompliance with the command of Mental Hygiene Law § 29.15 (g), which required preparation of a written service plan, with prescribed contents, for every person discharged from state psychiatric hospitals.

  3. Save Pine Bush v. Albany

    70 N.Y.2d 193 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 252 times
    In Matter of Save the Pine Bush v City of Albany (70 NY2d 193, 200), we held "that a proceeding alleging SEQRA violations in the enactment of legislation must be commenced within four months of the date of enactment of the ordinance."

  4. Har Enterprises v. Town of Brookhaven

    74 N.Y.2d 524 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 107 times
    In Har, the Court of Appeals held that a property owner whose land was targeted for rezoning had a "legally cognizable interest in being assured that the town satisfied SEQRA" and had standing to bring a SEQRA challenge, even absent a showing of specific environmental harm (id. at 529, 549 N.Y.S.2d 638, 548 N.E.2d 1289).

  5. New York State Superfund Coal., Inc. v. New York State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8996 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 39 times

    2011-12-15 In the Matter of NEW YORK STATE SUPERFUND COALITION, INC., Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION et al., Respondents. Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, Rochester (Thomas F. Walsh, Thomas J. Warth and Danielle E. Mettler of counsel), for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Andrew B. Ayers, Barbara D. Underwood and Denise A. Hartman of counsel), for respondents. JONES Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, Rochester (Thomas F. Walsh, Thomas J. Warth and Danielle

  6. Amazon.com, LLC v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance

    81 A.D.3d 183 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 1534, 1535. November 4, 2010. APPEAL, in the first above-entitled action, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered February 17, 2009. The judgment dismissed the complaint in an action to declare Tax Law § 1101 (b) (8) (vi) un-constitutional. APPEAL, in the second above-entitled action, from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered January 15, 2009. The order, among other things, directed entry of a judgment dismissing

  7. New York State Superfund Coalition, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

    75 N.Y.2d 88 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 43 times
    Holding that objectionable sections were not severable from entire statute despite presence of a severability clause

  8. New York Construction Materials Ass'n v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

    83 A.D.3d 1323 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 8 times

    No. 510593. April 21, 2011. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Williams, J.), entered April 26, 2010 in Saratoga County, which dismissed petitioners' application, in a combined proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and action for declaratory judgment, to, among other things, declare ECL 19-0323 to be unconstitutional and annul certain regulations promulgated by respondent Department of Environmental Conservation. Gilberti, Stinziano, Heintz Smith, P.C., Syracuse (Kevin G. Roe of counsel)

  9. Riccelli Enters., Inc., v. N.Y. Dept. Envtl. Con

    30 Misc. 3d 573 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2010)   Cited 4 times

    No. 2010-5942. December 14, 2010. Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General (Lisa M. Burianek of counsel), for defendants. Gilberti Stinziano Heintz Smith, P.C. (William J. Gilberti, Jr. and Kevin G. Roe of counsel), for plaintiff. OPINION OF THE COURT DONALD A. GREENWOOD, J. The defendants New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter, DEC) and Alexander B. Grannis, as its Commissioner, initially moved to convert the plaintiffs action from that seeking a declaratory judgment to a

  10. Hospital Assn. v. Axelrod

    164 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)   Cited 12 times

    December 27, 1990 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County, Lawrence E. Kahn, J. Segal, Sherrin Glasel (Jeffrey J. Sherrin of counsel), for appellants. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Clifford A. Royael of counsel), for David Axelrod and others, respondents. Hinman, Straub, Pigors Manning, P.C. (Bartley J. Costello, III, of counsel), for New York State Conference of Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans, respondent. Harry Franklin (Carol G. Dunham of counsel), for Committee of Interns and Residents