25 Cited authorities

  1. Martinez v. Bloomberg LP

    740 F.3d 211 (2d Cir. 2014)   Cited 202 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mere inability to pursue United States statutory cause of action in England did not defeat enforcement of forum selection clause
  2. Smith Barney v. Sacharow

    91 N.Y.2d 39 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 245 times
    Holding that an agreement governed by New York law that states that “[a]ny controversy ... shall be settled by arbitration” clearly and unmistakably reserves the decision of arbitrability for the arbitrator
  3. Primex Intl Corp. v. Wal-Mart

    89 N.Y.2d 594 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 231 times
    Holding that commercial disputes relating to two expired contracts were arbitrable, but any portion of the disputes relating to the last contract between the parties, which lacked an arbitration clause, was not arbitrable
  4. Brooke Group Ltd. v. JCH Syndicate 488

    87 N.Y.2d 530 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 222 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that a clause requiring one party to "submit to the jurisdiction of a Court of competent jurisdiction within the United States" did not require defendants to litigate plaintiff's claims in New York
  5. Two Guys v. S.F.R. Realty Associates

    63 N.Y.2d 396 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 258 times
    Recognizing that New York courts interpreting contracts should "avoid an interpretation that would leave contractual clauses meaningless"
  6. Welsbach Electric Corp. v. MasTec North America

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8632 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 127 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that New York's public policy against pay-if-paid contracts is not so fundamental that it should override the parties' choice of Florida law, which permits pay-if-paid contracts
  7. NML Capital v. Republic of Argentina

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5581 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 83 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Observing that Argentina did not dispute that it "was required to repay the principal indebtedness"
  8. Ministers & Missionaries Benefit Bd. v. Snow

    2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 9186 (N.Y. 2015)   Cited 50 times
    In Ministers, the Court of Appeals of New York did not have cause to address the status of prior law recognizing that the parties' choice of law must yield to a conflicting law reflecting the "fundamental public policy" of a state with a "materially greater interest" in the dispute than the chosen state.
  9. Finucane v. Interior Construction Corp.

    264 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that New York enforces choice-of-law provisions provided that " the law of the State selected has a reasonable relation[ship] to the agreement . . . and (b) the law chosen does not violate a fundamental public policy of New York"
  10. State v. Philip Morris Inc.

    30 A.D.3d 26 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 45 times
    Concluding that master settlement agreement provides for one nationwide, binding arbitration of dispute over whether independent auditor correctly determined not to apply nonparticipating manufacturer adjustment