§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation.---------------------------------Stanislaw Faltynowicz, et al., Appellants, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant,v.Battery Park City Authority, et al., Respondents.---------------------------------Santiago Alvear, Appellant, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Battery Park City Authority, Respondent.---------------------------------Peter Curley et al., Appellants, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Battery Park City Authority, Respondent.

Brief

18 Cited authorities

  1. Society of Plastics v. Suffolk

    77 N.Y.2d 761 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 958 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Society of Plastics Indus. v. County of Suffolk, 77 N.Y.2d 761, 570 N.Y.S.2d 778, 573 N.E.2d 1034 (1991), this Court examined the law of standing, and set forth a framework for deciding whether parties have standing to challenge governmental action in land use matters generally, and under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art. 8 [SEQRA]), specifically.

  2. Williams v. Mayor

    289 U.S. 36 (1933)   Cited 315 times
    Recognizing that "a subordinate unit of government created by the State to carry out delegated governmental functions" or "a political subdivision, 'created by a state for the better ordering of government, has no privileges or immunities under the federal constitution which it may invoke in opposition to the will of its creator' "

  3. City of New York v. State

    86 N.Y.2d 286 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 112 times
    Observing "extreme reluctance of courts to intrude in the political relationships between the Legislature, the State and its governmental subdivisions"

  4. In re Goldstein

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8677 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 68 times
    Holding that a state court may toll the statute of limitations and allow the refilling of a state Article 78 proceeding where the federal cause of action was dismissed on curable grounds

  5. In re World Trade Ctr. Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig.

    44 F. Supp. 3d 409 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)   Cited 18 times
    Finding that Espinal and Moch stood for "the general public policy that courts will not impose a tort duty on a contracting party where doing so would expose the party to potentially unlimited and undefined liability" and finding a duty where there was "no risk of ... boundless tort liability"

  6. Jeter v. Ellenville Central

    41 N.Y.2d 283 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 59 times
    Holding that local board of education and department of social services lacked “substantive right” to challenge constitutionality of provision of New York Education Law allocating the cost of educating pupils placed in family homes to the district in which the pupil originally resided

  7. Fleischer v. State Liquor Auth.

    103 A.D.3d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 9 times

    2013-02-28 In re Georgette FLEISCHER, etc., Petitioner–Appellant, v. The NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, et al., Respondents–Respondents. Georgette Fleischer, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Simon Heller of counsel), for State respondents. SAXE Georgette Fleischer, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Simon Heller of counsel), for State respondents. Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP, New York (Ron Mandel of counsel), for 114 Kenmare

  8. Patterson v. Carey

    41 N.Y.2d 714 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that "the statute is arbitrary and deprives bondholders of a contractual right without due process of law"

  9. Matter of Crespo

    123 Misc. 2d 862 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1984)   Cited 27 times

    March 16, 1984 Stanley J. Sanders, P.C. ( Barbara E. Manes of counsel), for petitioner. MARTIN EVANS, J. This proceeding, denoted by movant as a motion to amend a notice of claim, although submitted on default, poses several unusual practice questions. Can amendment of a notice of claim be sought by preaction motion? Can such an amendment be used to effectively add a party where the motion does not request such relief? Is service of a notice of claim on the New York City Transit Authority effective

  10. Rivera v. Laporte

    120 Misc. 2d 733 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1983)   Cited 22 times

    August 17, 1983 Levy, Gutman, Goldberg Kaplan ( Robin J. Arzt of counsel), for plaintiff. MARTIN EVANS, J. This deceptively simple motion for a default judgment, itself submitted on default, requires that the court reassess the notice requirements for entry of a default judgment under CPLR 3215. The motion raises constitutional questions of first impression. Plaintiff Rivera, a bus dispatcher, sues Laporte, a correction officer, Colon, a former correction officer, and the City of New York for assault

  11. Section 50-E - Notice of claim

    N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 50-E   Cited 4,861 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim shall be made to “the supreme court or to the county court”