Chicago v. Int'l Coll. of Surgeons
522 U.S. 156 (1997) Cited 4,606 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that § 1367 "applies with equal force to cases removed to federal court as to cases initially filed there; a removed case is necessarily one 'of which the district courts . . . have original jurisdiction.'"
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila
542 U.S. 200 (2004) Cited 2,695 times 30 Legal Analyses
Holding that states cannot create new causes of action that conflict with ERISA's " ‘interlocking, interrelated, and interdependent remedial scheme,’ " located in § 502 of ERISA
Krashna v. Oliver Realty, Inc.
895 F.2d 111 (3d Cir. 1990) Cited 64 times
Holding IIED claim based on harassment and termination after filing workers' compensation claim was not preempted by § 301
Conner v. Salzinger
457 F.2d 1241 (3d Cir. 1972) Cited 50 times
Holding that a district court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a notice of removal filed by a plaintiff
Section 1441 - Removal of civil actions
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Cited 49,836 times 148 Legal Analyses
Holding that “[a]ny civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising under the ... laws of the United States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship or residence of the parties.”