§Why CasetextPricing

Request Judicial Notice

undefined

32 Cited authorities

  1. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Assoc. of the United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

    463 U.S. 29 (1983)   Cited 6,794 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding that " `settled course of behavior embodies the agency's informed judgment that, by pursuing that course, it will carry out the policies [of applicable statutes or regulations]'"

  2. Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. Shalala

    512 U.S. 504 (1994)   Cited 1,283 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the agency’s interpretation must be given controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation"

  3. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization

    19 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 647 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “administrative interpretation ... will be accorded great respect by the courts and will be followed it not clearly erroneous”

  4. Feduniak v. California Coastal Commn.

    148 Cal.App.4th 1346 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 131 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that estoppel and laches are generally questions of fact but may be decided as a matter of law where facts are undisputed

  5. Browne v. County of Tehama

    213 Cal.App.4th 704 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 67 times
    Holding that an appellant forfeited a contention by failing to "present[ it] in the argument section of either the opening or reply brief"

  6. Gong v. City of Rosemead

    226 Cal.App.4th 363 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 64 times
    Holding substantial compliance exception could not save plaintiff's claim when her claim forms included "no reference whatsoever" to defendant's allegedly tortious acts and did not indicate damages sought for those acts

  7. Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish and Wildlife

    237 Cal.App.4th 411 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 43 times   1 Legal Analyses

    C073735 06-04-2015 SISKIYOU COUNTY FARM BUREAU, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Robert W. Byrne, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Randy L. Barrow, Deputy Attorney General, Gary Alexander, Ali A. Karaouni, and Deborah L. Barnes, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant. David R. Owen, Walnut Creek, for Law Professors as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant. Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger

  8. Gomes v. County of Mendocino

    37 Cal.App.4th 977 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 66 times
    Concluding that a statute covering "a person, firm, corporation, partnership or association" included federal government

  9. Los Angeles International Charter High School v. Los Angeles Unified School District

    209 Cal.App.4th 1348 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 32 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Involving an appeal from an order discharging a writ; appellate court "will uphold the [District's facilities] decision unless it is devoid of evidentiary support"

  10. Berkeley Hills Watershed Coal. v. City of Berkeley

    31 Cal.App.5th 880 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 20 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting interest group's contention, made for the first time on appeal, that construction of single-family homes might activate a landslide affecting protected coast oak trees: "Plaintiffs failed to raise this issue during the administrative process, and thus have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies"

  11. Section 453 - Notice to adverse parties

    Cal. Evid. Code § 453   Cited 440 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Prescribing the conditions under which “[t]he trial court shall take judicial notice of any matter specified in Section 452”

  12. Section 15060 - Preliminary Review

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14 § 15060   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing preliminary review

  13. Section 1391 - Definitions

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 20 § 1391

    "Asset-controlling supplier" means any entity that owns or operates interconnected electricity generating facilities or serves as an exclusive marketer for these facilities even though it does not own them, and is assigned a supplier-specific identification number and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions factor by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for the wholesale electricity procured from its system and imported into California. "Balancing authority" means the responsible entity that integrates