Order Ex ParteCal. Super. - 6th Dist.May 5, 2021on 11/12/2021 10:46 ANReviewed By: A. Floresca Case #21CV381463 Envelope: 7652883 EFS-020 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT A‘I'I'ORNEY: STATE BAR NO.: FOR COURT USE ONLY JAMES R. WILLIAMS, County Counsel (SBN 271253) NAME; XAVIER M. BRANDWAJN, Deputy County Counsel (SBN 246218) FIRM NAME; OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL STREETADDRESS; 70 W. Hedding Street, East Wing, 9th Floor CITY: san Jose STATE: CA ZIP CODE: 951 10 TELEPHONE No; 408-299-5900 FAX No; 408-292-7240 E.MAIL ADDRESS; xavier. brandwaj n@cco.sccgov.org ATTORNEY FOR (name); County of Santa Clara SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F SANTA CLARA STREETADDRESS: 191 N. First Street MAILINGADDRESS; - same - CITY AND ZIP CODE: San Jose 951 13 BRANCH NAME; Downtown Superior Court CASE NUMBER: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: David Kissner and Shahryar Rokni 21CV381463 Santa Clara County Superintendent of Schools ?_LI’D'C'ALOEFI'CES I W”. dDEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dr. Mary AnnDewan, et al. onora e e e_n ' 'ams a“ Honorable Carrle Zepeda OTHER: DEPT: PROPOSED ORDER (COVER SHEET) 12 NOTE: This cover sheet is to be used to electronically file and submit to the court a proposed order. The proposed order sent electronically to the court must be in PDF format and must be attached to this cover sheet. In addition, a version of the proposed order in an editable word-processing format must be sent to the court at the same time as this cover sheet and the attached proposed order in PDF format are filed. 1. Name of the party submitting the proposed order: Respondents Santa Clara County Superintendent of Schools Dr. Mary AnnDewan and Santa Clara County Office of Education 2. Title of the proposed order: [Proposed] Order Granting Respondents‘ Ex Parte Application t0 Continue Hearing on Petitioners' Motion for Attorneys' Fees 3. The proceeding to which the proposed order relates is: Respondents' ex parte application to continue January 10, 2022 hearing on Petitioners' Motion for Attorneys' Fees a. Description of proceeding: EX parte application to continue hearing b. Date and time: N/A per Civil Local Rule 16(C). c. Place: Department 12, Downtown Superior Court, 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 4. The proposed order was served on the other parties in the case. Yes. XAVIER M. BRANDWAJN b ls/ Xavier M. Brandwajn (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) Page 1 of2 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use PROPOSED ORDER (COVER SHEET) Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California . . . rules 2.252, 3‘1 312 EFS-020 [Rev. February 1, 2017] (EleCtronlc Flllng) www.courts.oa‘gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FonnsWorkFlow.com . EFS-020 CASE NAME: CASE NUMBER: David Kissner et al. v. Santa Clara County Superintendent of Schools Dr. Mary 21CV381463 Ann Dewan PROOF 0F ELECTRONIC SERVICE PROPOSED ORDER 1. | am at least 18 years old and not a party to this action. Yes. a. My residence or business address is (specify): 70 W. Hedding Street, East Wing, 9‘“ Floor, San Jose, CA 951 10 b. My electronic service address is (specify): linda.ramos@cco.sccgov.org 2. | electronically served the Proposed Order (Cover Sheet) with a proposed order in PDF format attached, and a proposed order in an editable word-processing format as follows: a. On (name ofperson served) (If the person served is an attorney, the party or parties represented should also be stated): JP Fisher, Esq.; James R. Sutton, Esq.; Brian D. Bock, Esq.; Ruby Marquez, Esq.; Deputy County Counsel Mary Hanna- Weir, b. To (electronic service address ofperson served): jpfisher@campaignlawyers.com; jsutton@campaignlawyers.com; brian@proactiveBLG.com; ruby.marquez@santacruzcounty.us; mary.hanna-weir@cco.sccgov.org. c. On (date): November 12, 2021 E Electronic service of the Proposed Order (Cover Sheet) with the attached proposed order in PDF format and service of the proposed order in an editable word-processing format 0n additional persons are described in an attachment. | declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: November 12, 2021 Linda Ramos P ls/ Linda Ramos (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT) EFS-OZO [Rev. February 1, 2017] PROPOSED ORDER (COVER SHEET) Page 2 of2 (Electronic Filing) American LegalNet, Inc. www.FonnsWorkFlow.com 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES R. WILLIAMS, County Counsel (S.B. #271253) XAVIER M. BRANDWAJN, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #246218) OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL 7O West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor San Jose, California 95 1 10-1770 Telephone: (408) 299-5900 Facsimile: (408) 292-7240 Email: Xavier.Brandwain@cco.sccgov.org Attorneys for Respondents SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS DR. MARY ANN DEWAN and SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DAVID KISSNER AND SHAHRYAR ROKNI, N0. 21CV38 1463 Petitioners, Exempt from Filing Fees Pursuant t0 Gov. Code § 6103 V. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SANTA CLARA COUNTY RESPONDENTS’ EXPARTE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS DR. APPLICATION TO CONTINUE HEARING MARY ANN DEWAN et al., ON PETITIONERS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES Respondents. 1 [Proposed] Order Granting Respondents’ Ex Parte Application to 21CV381463 Continue Hearing 011 Petitioners’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees XXXXXXXXX XXXXX Filed November 17, 2021 County of Santa Clara Superior Court of CA Clerk of the Court 21CV381463 By: afloresca Signed: 11/17/2021 08:12 AM 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is the ex parte application by Respondents Santa Clara County Superintendent 0f Schools Dr. Mary Ann Dewan and Santa Clara County Office 0f Education for an order continuing the January 10, 2022 hearing 0n Petitioners David Kissner’s and Shahryar Rokni’s motion for attorneys’ fees until Respondents’ pending appeal is resolved. Good cause appearing and no opposition havin been filed, . _ based on the papers presente$>£he Court ereby GRANTS the ex part6 apphcatlon as follows: 1. The January 10, 2022 hearing is hereby CONTINUED to March 14, 2022 at 1:30 pm in Department 12_ The hearing may be reset to another date and time to accommodate Judge Ibarra's schedule. 2. The parties shall promptly notify the Court if the pending appeal is not resolved by March 14, 2022 0r if other extenuating circumstances moot 0r justify a further continuance 0f the hearing The parties must also notify the Court when the remittitur issues from the Court of Appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED. November 16, 2021 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Helen E. Williams 2516446 1 RMW] Order Granting Respondents’ EX Parte Application to 21CV38 1463 Continue Hearing on Petitioners’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees
