Notice Related Cases

Cal. Super. - 6th Dist.March 29, 2021

CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): _Geoffrey A. Kraemer, Esq., SBN 298220 Law Offices of Robert A. Stutman, P.C. 1260 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 306 Corona, CA 92879 TELEPHONE No.: (951) 387-4700 FAX No. (Optional): (951) 963-1 298 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): KraemerG@StutmanlaW.00m ATTORNEY FOR(Name): Plaintiff Mercury Casualty Company SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F Santa Clara STREET ADDRESS: 191 North First Street MAILING ADDRESS: 191 North First Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: San Jose 951 13 BRANCH NAME: Downtown Superior Court FOR COURT USE ONLY E-FILED 5/18/2021 11:43 AM Clerk of Court Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara 21 CV38146O Reviewed By: M Vu PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Mercury Casualty Company DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Pacific Weathershield |nc.; and Does 1 to 10, inclusive CASE NUMBER: 21 CV38 1 460 JUDICIAL OFFICER: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE DEPT.: Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: Catherine Yard Court, LLC v. Pacific Weathershield, Inc. b. Case number: 21CV380663 c. Court: E same as above D other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: 20 e. Casetype:D limited civilE unlimited civil D probate D familylaw f. Filing date: March 18, 2021 Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" D Yes g h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): E involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. D other (specify): No E arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. E involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. E is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication ofjudicial resources if heard by differentjudges. D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case: E pending D dismissed D with D without prejudice D disposed of byjudgment 2. a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court: D same as above D other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial CouncilofCaIifornia NOTICE OF RELATED CASE CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] Page 1 of 3 Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 www.courtinfo.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com CM-015 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER; Mercury Casualty Company CASE NUMBER= DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Pacific Weathershield |nc., et al. 21CV381460 2. (continued) e. Casetype: D limited civil D unlimited civil D probate D familylaw D other(specify): f. Filing date: g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" D Yes D No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): D involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. D arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. D involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. D is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication ofjudicial resources if heard by different judges. D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h i. Status of case: D pending D dismissed D with D without prejudice D disposed of byjudgment 3. a. Title: Case number: Court: D same as above D other state or federal court (name and address): .0 Department: Casetype:D limited civil D unlimited civil D probate D familylaw D other (specify): Filing date: Hasthis case been designated ordetermined as"complex?" D Yes D No :aorhsvg Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): D involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. D arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. D involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. D is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication ofjudicial resources if heard by different judges. D Additional explanation is attached in attachment 3h i. Status of case: D pending D dismissed D with D withoutprejudice D disposed of by judgment 4. D Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4. Number of pages attached: Date: May 18, 2021 " .-" Ir! I. I Geoffrey A. Kraemer b :’ ' - ' (TYPE 0R PRINT NAME 0F PARTY 0R ATTORNEY) I (SIGNATURE 0F PARTY 0R ATTORNEY) CM-o15 [Rev. July 1, 2007] NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Page 2 of 3 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkf/ow.com CM-015 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Mercury Casualty Company CASE NUMBER 21CV381460DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Pacific Weathershield |nc., et al. PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL NOTICE OF RELATED CASE (NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice of Related Case ifyou are a party in the action. The person who served the notice must complete this proof of service. The notice must be served on aII known parties in each related action or proceeding.) 1. | am at least 18 years old and not a party to this action. | am a resident of or employed In the county where the mailing took place, and my residence or business address is (specify): SEE ATTACHED PROOF OF SERVICE 2. | served a copy of the Notice of Related Case by enclosing it in a sealed envelope with first-class postage fully prepaid and (check one): a. D deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service. b. D placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices, with which | am readily familiar. On the same day correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service. 3. The Notice of Related Case was mailed: a. on (date): b. from (city and state): 4. The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows: a. Name of person served: c. Name of person served: Street address: Street address: City: City: State and zip code: State and zip code: b. Name of person served: d. Name of person served: Street address: Street address: City: City: State and zip code: State and zip code: D Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. (You may use form POS-030(P).) | declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT) CM-o15 [Rev. July 1, 2007] NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Pageaofs American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com D H m .b QGUI 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Mercury Casualty Company v. Pacific Weathershield, et al. Santa Clara County Case N0. 21CV381460 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE At the time 0f service, I was over 18 years 0f age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Riverside, State of California. My business address is 1260 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 306, Corona, CA 92879. On May 18, 2021, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as NOTICE OF RELATED CASE on the interested parties in this action as follows: Susan D. Pelmulder, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Catherine Yard ROSE PERKINS PELMULDER, APA Court, LLC 125 East Sunnyoaks Avenue, Suite 102 Campbell, CA 95008 Tel: 408-399-4566 Fax: 408-399-6683 email: sue@nelmulder.com BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: I caused a copy of the document(s) t0 be sent from e-mail address guerram@Stutmanlaw.com t0 the persons at the e- mail addresses listed in the Service List. The document(s) were transmitted at or before 5:00 p.m. I did not receive, Within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message 0r other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws 0f the State 0f California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed 0n May 18, 2021, at Corona, California. /s/ Misty Guerra Misty Guerra