Statement Case Management Conference

Cal. Super. - 6th Dist.April 1, 2021

21 CV381453 Santa Clara - Civil Syscmsvmm ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Brian L: Larsen 158252 Electronically Filed E337 Offices of Brian L . Larsen by Superior Court of CA,Jackson Street, 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94133 county Of santa Clara’ TELEPHONEN0.: (415) 398-5000 FAXNo.(0ptiona/): (415) 398-5080 on 7/14/2021 11:28 AM E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): brian@brianlarsenlaw . com RGVieWed By: system system ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Narayal’l Dahal case #21 CV381 453 SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F Santa Clara Envelope: 6344337 STREETADDRESS: l9]. North First Street MAILING ADDRESS: CITYANDZIPCODE: San Jose , CA 9 5 113 BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Narayal’l Dahal DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Blake Yamaichi , Bateman Commun Elior Inc., and DOES l to lO CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): fl UNLIMITED CASE D LIMITED CASE 2 1CV3 8 14 5 3 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 8/10/2021 Time: 3 : 00pm Dept.: 20 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): D Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. m This statement is submitted by party (name): Narayan Dahal b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 4 / l /2 O 2 l b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. D A|| parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. m The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): We are still trying to serve out defendant Yamaichi (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in m complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Automobile accident Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use , . Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California C-EB Essentlal CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3720-3730 CM-1 10 [Rev. July 1, 201 1] “ham EFoms- www.coun‘s.ca.gov Dahal, Narayan CM-11O DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Blake Yamaichi, Bateman Commu PLAINTI FF/PETITIONER:NarayaI1 Daha l CASE NUMBER: 21CV381453 Elior Inc., and DOES l to 10 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (prersonal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.) Plaintiff was riding his bicycle when he was hit by the Defendant. Injuries:Dislocated knees,bruises. Medicals:$47,l95.3l. D (If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) 5. Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request m a jury trial D a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): 6. Trial date a. D The trial has been set for (date): b. m No trial date has been set. This case wi|| be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): c. Dates on which parties or attorneys wi|| not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): 9/6/21,9/13/21,9/20/21,9/27/21, 10/4/21, 10/11/21, 10/18/21, 10/25/21 11/1/21,11/8/21,11/15/21,ll/21/21,ll/29/21,12/6/21,12/13/21,12/20/21 12/27/21,1/3/22,1/10/22,1/17/22,1/24/22,l/3l/22,2/7/22,2/l4/22 7. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a. m days (specify number): 3 - 4 b. D hours (short causes) (specify): 8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial m by the attorney or party listed in the caption D by the following: a. Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: e. E-mail address: g. Party represented:D Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. 9. PreferenceD This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. (1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel has D has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client. (2) For seIf-represented parties: Party D has D has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221. b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). (1) D This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141 .11 or to civil action mediation under of Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. (2) D Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141 .1 1. (3) D This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption): CM-Ho [Rem July 1, 20111 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 of 5 ' Essential SEE. EM“ Dahal , Narayan CM-11O PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:Narayan Dahal CASE NUMBER: 2 lCV3 8 l 4 5 3 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Blake Yamaichi, Bateman Commu Elior Inc., and DOES l to lO 10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information): The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the pan‘ies'ADR processes (check all that apply): stipulation): D Mediation session not yet scheduled (1) Mediation D D Mediation sessmn scheduled for (date):D Agreed to complete mediation by (date): D Mediation completed on (date): Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement m D Settlement conference scheduled for (date): conference D Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date): D Settlement conference completed on (date): D Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled . N t I I t' h I f t .' (3) Neutral evaluatlon D D eu ra eva ua Ion sc edu ed or (da e)D Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): D Neutral evaluation completed on (date): D Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbinding judicial D D Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date).- arb'tratlon D Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date): D Judicial arbitration completed on (date): D Private arbitration not yet scheduled (5) Binding private D D Private arbitration scheduled for (date): arb'tratlon D Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): D Private arbitration completed on (date): D ADR session not yet scheduled (6) Other (specify): D D ADR session scheduled for (date): D Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): D ADR completed on (date): CM-11o [Rewuly 1,2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Pageaofs CEB‘ Essential ceb.com Em- Dahal, Narayan CM-11O DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Blake Yamaichi, Bateman Commun PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:Narayan Daha l CASE NUMBER: 21CV381453 Elior Inc., and DOES l to lO 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Insurance a. D Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): b. Reservation of rights: D Yes D No c. D Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case, and describe the status.D Bankruptcy D Other (specify): Status: Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. D There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status:D Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b. D A motion to D consolidate D coordinate wi|| befiled by (name party): BifurcationD The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): Other motionsD The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): Discovery a. D The party or parties have completed all discovery. b. E The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): PaJt Descrigtion m Plaintiff Discovery ongoing with Defendants 10/30/2021 Elior and Bateman Plaintiff Discovery has not begun with Unknown Defendant Yamaichi c. D The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): CM-Ho [Rem July 1, 20111 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 4 of 5 CEB' ceb.com Essential iaEEES Dahal, Narayan CM-1 10 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Narayan Daha 1 CASE NUMBER: 21CV381453 DHENWWWREPOMENE Blake Yamaichi, Bateman Commun Elior InC., and DOES l to 10 17. Economic litigation a. D This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 wi|| apply to this case. b. D This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 18. Other issues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management coMmmmefiwedmt Defendants Bateman and Elior have answered the Discovery is ongoing.We have not yet served Defendant Yamaichi,but there is counsel that will be present once the Defendant has been served. 19. Meet and confer a. D The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any):- | am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: 7/14/2021 Brian L Larsen > ‘ :L’Z- (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OH ATTORNEY) b (TYPE 0R PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) D Additional signatures are attached. CM-HO [ReV-July 1,2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Pagesofs CEB' Essential :ebxom Em- Dahal, Narayan PROOFfl SERVICE VIA EMAIL I, the undersigned, declare: I am over the age 0f 18 years, I am not a party t0 this action, and work at 530 Jackson St. San Francisco, California. On July 14, 2021, I personally emailed a copy 0f the following Via electronic transmission to the person at the email below. Pursuant to the California Rules of Court, Appendix 1, Emergency Rule 12, we are serving the following Via email only. If there are any obj ections, please respond promptly as there will be no physical copies t0 follow. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Emailed To: Deidre Cohen Katz, Esq. Robert L. Nelder, Esq. WFBM, LLP One Sansome Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 dkatz@wfbm.com melder@wfbm.com Attorneyfor Defendants Bateman Community Living, LLC erroneously sued as Bateman Community Living I swear under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct; and that this declaration was executed this July 14, 2021, at San Francisco, California. APRIL TAN