Judgment Default

Cal. Super. - 6th Dist.April 27, 2021

ATTDRNEY 08 pARTY wITHDUT ATTDRNE Y (Name, stale sar number, end address): KIRKMAN J. HOFFMAN, ESQ. SBN: 148663 HOFFMAN LAW GROUP, APC. 2021 THE ALAMEDA, SUITE 8275, SAN JOSE, CA 95126 lELEPHONENOJ (408)-241-9620 FANNO.(opdonaSr 6-MAILADDREBB(DFIMmfp Info(ekirkhoffmsn,corn ATrcRNEYFOR(Name)r PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF CAUFORIEIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA smEFT AooREsa 191 North First Street MAILINDADDREssr 191 North First Street OITYANDzIPODDE: San Jose, CA 95113 BRANcH NAME: Downtown Superior Court I'LAINTIFF: 1402 CAMDEN LLC FOR COURT USE ONLY UD-110 DEFENDANT: LIEM BUI, DBA BEST CLEANERS JUDGMENT-UNLAWFUL DETAINER CX] By Clerk WX By Default M After Court Trial~ By Court CX] Possession Only H Defendant Did Not Appear at Trial CASE NUMBER: 21CY381279 JUDGMENT 1. ~X BY DEFAULT a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint. b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law. c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintifFS application. d. ~X Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., 8 1169). For possession only of the premises described on page 2 (item 4). e. ~ Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., 8 565(b)). The court considered (1) E3 plaintifFs testimony and other evklence. (2)~ plaintiff's or others'ritten declaration and evidence (Code Civ. Proc., 8 585(d)). 2. C3 AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence. a. The case was tried on (date and time): before (name of judicial officer): b. Appearances by:~ Plaintiff (name each): ~ Plaintiffs attorney (name each): (2) ~ Continued on Attachment 2b (form MC-025). ~ Defendant (name each): ~ Defendant's attorney (name each): (2) ~ Continued on Attachment 2b (form MC-025). c. ~ Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial. d. ~ Astatementofdecision(Code Civ. Proc.,5632) C] was not Ej was requested. Fofnr Approved for Opaonel Use Judmial Coundl of Caafornis UD.I I O INsn Jsnuarr I, 2005I JUDGMENT-UNLAWFUL DETAINER Page I ol2 code ofclut prooedure,25 415.46, 5BB(d), 664.6, 1166 Electronically Filed by Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Reviewed By: M Vu Case #21CV381279 Envelope: 6513617 5/26/2021 PLAINTIFF: 1402 CAMDEN LLC DEFENDANT: LIEM BUI, DBA BEST CLEANERS JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: 3. Parties. Judgment is a. ~X for plaintiff (name each): 1402 CAMDEN LLC CASE NUMSEFa 21CV381279 ~ THECOURT ~X THE CLERK and against defendant (name each): Liem Bui, Dba Best Cleaners ~ Continued on Attachment 3a (form MC-025). b. ~ for defendant (name each): 4 CX] Plaintiff ~ Defendant is entitled to possession of the premises located at (street address, apartment, city, and county): 2854 ALUM ROCK AVENUE, SAN JOSE, CA 95127, SANTA CLARA COUNTY 5. ~ Judgment applies to all occupants of the premises including tenants, subtenants if any, and named claimants if any (Code Civ. Proc., $$ 715.010, 1168, and 1174.3). 6 Amount and terms of judgment a ~ Defendant named in item 3a above must pay plaintiff on the complaint: U) ~ Past-due rent (2) C3 Holdover damages (3) M Attorney fees (4) M Costs (5) M Other (specify): b. ~ Plaintiff is to receive nothing from defendant named in item 3b.~ Defendant named in item 3b is to recover costs: $~ and attorney fees: $ (6) TOTAL JUDGMENT c. ~ The rental agreement is canceled. C3 The lease is forfeited. ~ Conditional judgment. Plaintiff has breached the agreement to provide habitable premises to defendant as stated in Judgment-Unlawful Detainer Attachment (form UD-1 10$), which is attached. 8 M Other (specify): ~ Continued on Attachment 8 (form MC-025). Date: JUDICIAL OFFICER Date: (SEALI MX Clerk, by CLERK'S CERTIFICATE (Optional) I certify that this is a true copy of the original judgment on file in the court. , Deputy Date: Clerk, by , Deputy UD.1 10 INew January I, 2002I JUDGMENT-UNLAWFUL DETAINER Paae20fa /s/ M Vu5/26/2021