Clerk Rejection LetterCal. Super. - 6th Dist.March 2, 2021SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DOWNTOWN COURTHOUSE - CIVIL DIVISION l9] North First Street San Jose, California 95 l l3 (408) 88 2'2 100 o Public Case Information Website: httgscllcmgonalscscoumorg/Ponal/ Providing access to local cases through online search & retrieval. o Main Website: www.scscourtogg Providing access to rules, self help information, forms, fees, locations & phone numbers. Civil Filing Rejection Letter [ [ [ ] Case Number: 21CV378994 1 ] Case Title: Robertson vs Lucnlle Salter Pacard Children s Hospital Dear Sir/Madam: The Document is being returned for the following reason(s): 1 . .“9’9‘5‘9’5’ 9. 10. 11. .. f‘ Notes for Future Reference: pm$ Vb 15. 16. 17. Date: “5/2022 RB Clerk of the Court D The Civil Case Cover Sheet adopted by Rule 3.220 is missing. Please submit the cover sheet within 1O days of this Notice or you may be subject to sanctions under California Rules of Court, Rule 2.30. D The case number is D missing, D incorrect, or D incomplete. D The documents MUST be on adopted Judicial Council forms. D Forms are obsolete. D The document is incomplete. Please complete information where “Red" check marks are placed; D The document is missing an original signature. D The document requires a $ Filing Fee or Waiver of Fees granted by this Court. D The document is not in compliance with Rule 2.100-2.1 19 as follows: a. D Caption page required c. D State Bar Number required b. D Two-hole punch and stapled d. D Telephone number D Requestfor Dismissal is incomplete. Please provide the information requested. Complete: a. D item 1a. D item 1b. b. D item 2, need consentof D Cross-Complaint D Intervener D Complaint D An Order of Court is required prior to filing this document. D The case was dismissed on: D The document is filed in the incorrect Court. E Other: As of February 13, 2018, it is now mandatory for Attorneys to submit all filing electronically. Please use a EFS-020 proposed order cover when submitting your proposed order. ~ H’ Dar uubfille; www. 160$ 001441 org D To expedite your requests for Writs or Abstracts, please submit an endorsed filed copy of yourjudgment. D Please enclose a self-addressed stamped envelope for the return of your copies. D Please make checks payable to: Clerk Superior Court Clerk, by ‘ 77m Cour! smfl‘is no! authorized (o give you legal advice or inxtruclyou on which Iegalfarms Io use. as 111i: constilule: an unat ted praclice oflaun 7712 Cour! recommends Illa! you seek appropriate legal msislance, CV-5020 REV 12/03/15 .4 @mam OMNQUI&WN Gordon & Recs LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 NNNNtbquNN___.-______ ooqmu-awN-ooooxnoxmawN-o MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN I66805) ALYSON S. CABRERA (SBN 222717) PAMELA Y. NG (SBN 273036) GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94l I I Telephone: (415) 986-5900 y Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 mbruno@grsm.com acabrera@grsm.com png@grsm.com Anomeys for Defendant LUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA [N AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Case No. 2|C_V378994SHAWN ROBERTSON, Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Vs. f Complaint filed: March 2, 2021 LUCILLE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD, and DOES I through 10, inclusive, Defendants. vavvvvvvvvvv l. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve produétion of éonfidential, private, or official information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it afl'ords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as confidential. The parties further acknowledge that this Order does not waive the Stipulated Protective Ordelj
