Separate Statement

Cal. Super. - 6th Dist.February 1, 2021

IJ NO‘ Alexis J. DaCosta (pro se) dacostaalexisfi gmail.com I L E1202 Kifcr Road. Suite 802 Sunnyvale. Califomia 94086 2021 'l‘clcphone: 858-736-7618 APR 2 1 the Court Plaintiff ALEXIS DaCOSTA Sumo. eoumy oe 3°":ecrflk SUPERIOR COURT ()F THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY ()F SANTA CLARA ALEXIS DaCOSTA. an individual. Case N0. 21CH009837 Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF ALEXIS DaCOSTA’S v. SEPARATE STATEMENT ()F ISSUES IN SlTPPORT OF MOTION T0 KRZYSZTOF SYWULA. an individual. QUASH DEPOSITION SUBPOENA FOR CONSUMER RECORDS 0F Defendant. PLAINTIFF ALEXIS DaCOSTA Date: 5 lzs'z' Time: q Crlrm: Judge: H n. ‘ ' ' ERIK S. JOH Pursuant t0 California Rules 0f Coun. Rule 3.1345(a)(5). Plaintiff ALEXIS DaCOSTA ("DaCosIa") respectfully submits the following Separate Statement of Issues in Support of DaCosIa‘s Motion I0 Quash thc Deposition Subpoena for Consumer Records 0f DaCosta. served by Defendant KRZYSZTOF SYWULA ("Sywula“) in the above-entitled action. SEPARATE STATEMENT 0F ISSUES DOCUMENT REQUESTS 1. Documents and records sufficient to show the location and coordinates for the use and presence ot‘the phones associated with phone number (408) 466-9922 for the time period of January l. 2021 to the present. |’()lNTS AND AL'THORITIIZS IN SUPPORT ( )l MOI |()N l'()()lJASH SUBPOI-INA FOR CONSUMER Rl-(‘ORDS (‘asc Nn‘ 2|(‘H()()9837 2. Documents sufficient show each time the number (408) 466-9922 called the following phone numbers; (858) 226-4582: (858) 750-0290: and (858) 257-8906. GROUNDS FOR OBJECTION AND MOTION TO OUASH l. The deposition subpoena for the production 0f business records and things is not reasonably calculated to lead t0 the discovery of admissible evidence; 2. The deposition subpoena for the production of business records and things is designed to harass the witness. particularly given that the requesting party is the subject 0f a February 1. 2021 Temporary Restraining Order in the instant proceedings (see enclosed), issued to protect DaCosta from further harassment. harm. injury. and threat by Sywula. Disclosing personal location data would threaten DaCosta‘s personal safety and that of his family; 3. The deposition subpoena for the production of business records and things seeks DaCosta's personal identifying information and violates his California constitutional right of privacy (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. Section 1987.1(b)); 4. The deposition subpoena for the production of business records and things is objectionable under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. Section 1985.3(g). t0 the extent it seeks non-party consumer records; 5. The deposition subpoena for the production 0f business records and things is procedurally improper and ineffective: 6. The deposition subpoena for the production of business records and things has not been properly served: and 7. The deposition subpoena for the production 0f business records and things violates the Stored Communications Act (18 U.S.C. section 2701. e1 seq.) Dated: April 19. 2021 Respectfully Submitted By: /s/ Alexis DaCosta ALEXIS DACOSTA. Plaintiff 1 POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT ()F MOTION T0 QUASH SUBPOENA FOR CONSUMER RECORDS Case No. ZICH009837