§Why CasetextPricing

American Society of Journalists and Authors, Inc. v. Xavier Becerra

OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to TRO re Prohibiting Defendant, his officers, agents, servants, and employees from enforcing Cal. Labor Code § 2750.3

36 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 16,731 times   56 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"

  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.

    508 U.S. 307 (1993)   Cited 2,226 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a law survives rational basis review so long as there is "any reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification"

  3. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell

    632 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 3,892 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a “serious questions” version of the sliding scale approach to preliminary injunctions survives Winter

  4. Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo

    456 U.S. 305 (1982)   Cited 1,764 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Federal Water Pollution Control Act did not mandate injunctions against its violation

  5. Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.

    475 U.S. 41 (1986)   Cited 1,424 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that local governments may enact zoning ordinances against adult movie theaters to curb negative "secondary effects"

  6. Vance v. Bradley

    440 U.S. 93 (1979)   Cited 1,105 times
    Holding a statute survives review unless the classification "is so unrelated to ... any ... legitimate purpose that we can only conclude that the legislature's actions were irrational"

  7. Stormans v. Selecky

    586 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 1,433 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a corporation has standing to assert the free exercise rights of its owners

  8. Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley

    408 U.S. 92 (1972)   Cited 1,333 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding a law was content-based where it prohibited nonlabor-related picketing at a place of employment

  9. Carey v. Brown

    447 U.S. 455 (1980)   Cited 733 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ordinance violated equal protection where it banned all residential picketing except picketing of a place of employment involved in a labor dispute

  10. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.

    319 U.S. 315 (1943)   Cited 2,405 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal court may abstain from exercising its equity jurisdiction where doing so would "be prejudicial to the public interest" or would "so clearly involve basic problems of [State] policy" (quoting United States ex rel. Greathouse v. Dern , 289 U.S. 352, 360, 53 S.Ct. 614, 77 L.Ed. 1250 (1933) )

  11. Section 3351 - Employee defined

    Cal. Lab. Code § 3351   Cited 176 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Defining “employee” for purposes of worker's compensation law as “every person in the service of an employer ... whether lawfully or unlawfully employed, and includes Aliens”

  12. Section 2750 - Definition

    Cal. Lab. Code § 2750   Cited 21 times   1 Legal Analyses

    The contract of employment is a contract by which one, who is called the employer, engages another, who is called the employee, to do something for the benefit of the employer or a third person. Ca. Lab. Code § 2750 Enacted by Stats. 1937, Ch. 90.