49 Cited authorities

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore

    439 U.S. 322 (1979)   Cited 4,230 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district courts have discretion to refuse to apply offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against a defendant if such an application of the doctrine would be unfair
  2. Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand

    163 F.3d 925 (5th Cir. 1999)   Cited 668 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lawsuit alleging malpractice by an accountant in a bankruptcy case was a "core" matter within a bankruptcy court's jurisdiction
  3. Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. City of El Paso

    346 F.3d 541 (5th Cir. 2003)   Cited 394 times
    Holding that "[t]he district court's underlying findings of fact are subject to review for clear error and its conclusions of law are reviewed de novo"
  4. Recoveredge L.P. v. Pentecost

    44 F.3d 1284 (5th Cir. 1995)   Cited 472 times
    Finding issue preclusion appropriate where the predecessor of the party whom issue preclusion was asserted against had "moved the court to accept the jury's verdict and later to enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure."
  5. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. U.S.

    365 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 2004)   Cited 301 times
    Adopting the transactional test of the Restatement (Second) of Judgments, § 24
  6. Lomont v. Myer-Bennett

    172 So. 3d 620 (La. 2015)   Cited 121 times
    Holding that, where the fraud exception applies, "a legal malpractice claim is governed by the one-year prescriptive period set forth in La. C.C. art. 3492"
  7. Tubos De Acero De Mexico v. Am. Intern. Inv

    292 F.3d 471 (5th Cir. 2002)   Cited 154 times
    Finding that the plaintiff stated a claim for violation of LUTPA where it alleged that defendant made misrepresentations regarding its ability and intent to perform the underlying contract
  8. Riggins v. Dixie Shoring Co., Inc

    590 So. 2d 1164 (La. 1992)   Cited 141 times
    Finding that the corporate veil may be pierced when: the corporation acts as an "alter ego" of the shareholders and the shareholders have used the corporation to defraud a third party, and/or the shareholders have failed to observe corporate formalities to the extent the corporation ceases to be distinguishable from its shareholders
  9. Green Champion Ins. Co.

    577 So. 2d 249 (La. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 138 times
    Finding single business enterprise where controlling shareholder, common employees, employees were compensatedby both companies, employees performed services without regard to which of the corporations they worked for, the companies only did business given to it by the related businesses, financial activities were not properly reflected in the books, and funds were transferred without repayment schedule
  10. Universal Am. Barge Corp. v. J-Chem, Inc.

    946 F.2d 1131 (5th Cir. 1992)   Cited 130 times
    Holding that admission in arbitration was not binding in district court suit on the same subject matter
  11. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 90,140 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
  12. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,818 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"
  13. Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 16   Cited 33,509 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)
  14. Section 3492 - Delictual actions

    La. Civ. Code art. 3492   Cited 1,063 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Establishing one-year prescription period for "[d]elictual actions"
  15. Section 51:1401 - Short title

    La. Stat. tit. 51 § 1401   Cited 559 times   1 Legal Analyses

    This Chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law." La. R.S. § 51:1401 Added by Acts 1972, No. 759, §1. Added by Acts 1972, No. 759, §1.

  16. Section 4 - Jurisdiction of courts; duty of United States attorneys; procedure

    15 U.S.C. § 4   Cited 421 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting jurisdiction to "prevent and restrain" violations of the Sherman Act to federal district courts
  17. Section 51:1409 - Private actions

    La. Stat. tit. 51 § 1409   Cited 393 times
    Granting private right to bring damage action for unfair or deceptive trade practices
  18. Section 23:967 - Employee protection from reprisal; prohibited practices; remedies

    La. Stat. tit. 23 § 967   Cited 373 times   4 Legal Analyses

    A. An employer shall not take reprisal against an employee who in good faith, and after advising the employer of the violation of law: (1) Discloses or threatens to disclose a workplace act or practice that is in violation of state law. (2) Provides information to or testifies before any public body conducting an investigation, hearing, or inquiry into any violation of law. (3) Objects to or refuses to participate in an employment act or practice that is in violation of law. B. An employee may commence