§Why CasetextPricing

Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Hulu, LLC

MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,708,213, 6,757,796, and 9,462,074 and Memorandum in Support

2 Cited authorities

  1. Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

    632 F.3d 1292 (Fed. Cir. 2011)   Cited 410 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that evidence relying on "25 percent rule of thumb," which was a tool used to approximate the reasonable royalty rate the manufacturer of patented product would be willing to offer to pay to the patentee during a hypothetical negotiation, was inadmissible under Daubert since it failed to tie a reasonably royalty base to facts of case at issue

  2. Ingram v. Martin Marietta Long Term Dis. Inc.

    244 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 88 times
    Holding that provisions stating that a carrier would make all decisions on claims and that carrier will conduct a “full and fair review” of claim denials were insufficient to confer discretion on the carrier