Los Angeles v. Lyons
461 U.S. 95 (1983) Cited 7,492 times 13 Legal AnalysesHolding there is no justiciable controversy where plaintiff had once been subjected to a chokehold
Blanchard v. Bergeron
489 U.S. 87 (1989) Cited 2,032 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that, because there is no requirement in § 1988 that attorney's fees be incurred, contingent-fee agreements do not impose an automatic ceiling on the fees amount
Levy v. Senate of Pa.
65 A.3d 361 (Pa. 2013) Cited 111 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that "a client's identity is generally not privileged," though "the attorney-client privilege may apply in cases where divulging the client's identity would disclose either the legal advice given or the confidential communications provided"
Anderson v. Macy's, Inc.
943 F. Supp. 2d 531 (W.D. Pa. 2013) Cited 56 timesProviding factors courts look to in "determin[ing] the likelihood of a plaintiff returning to the place of [an] alleged ADA violation," including: " the plaintiff's proximity to the defendant's place of public accommodation; the plaintiff[']s past patronage; the definitiveness of the plaintiff's plan to return"
Hollinger v. Reading Health Sys.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-5249 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2017) Cited 11 timesReciting the test for evaluating standing under the ADA as “ plaintiff has alleged defendant engaged in past discriminatory conduct that violates the ADA; it is reasonable to infer from the allegations in the complaint that the discriminatory conduct will continue; and it is reasonable to infer based on past patronage, proximity of the place to the plaintiff's home, business, or personal connections to the area, that the plaintiff intends to return to the place in the future.”
Brown v. Mt Fuji Japanese Rest.
615 F. App'x 757 (3d Cir. 2015) Cited 8 timesDenying motions for summary judgment without prejudice pending an evidentiary hearing
Saint Luke's Hosp. of Bethlehem v. Vivian
2014 Pa. Super. 171 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014) Cited 5 times2014-10-15 SAINT LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM, Pennsylvania d/b/a St. Luke's Hospital and St. Luke's Hospital & Health Network, Appellants v. John R. VIVIAN, Jr., Esq., Martin D. Cohen, Esq., Cohen & Feeley, P.C., Dr. John Shane, M.D., Harry H. Miller, Executor of the Estate of Regina C. Miller, Appellees. Saint Luke's Hospital of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania d/b/a St. Luke's Hospital and St. Luke's Hospital & Health Network, Appellants v. John R. Vivian, Jr., Esq., Martin D. Cohen, Esq., Cohen & Freeley
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 94,538 times 650 Legal AnalysesAdopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay
Fed. R. Evid. 801 Cited 19,060 times 75 Legal AnalysesHolding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party
Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination
Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 Cited 16,027 times 126 Legal AnalysesUpholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely
Section 12102 - Definition of disability
42 U.S.C. § 12102 Cited 10,761 times 40 Legal AnalysesRecognizing ADA claim where plaintiff is "regarded as" disabled
Section 12005 - Demonstration and commercial application projects
42 U.S.C. § 12005 Cited 1 times(a) Purpose The purpose of this section is to direct the Secretary to further the commercialization of renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies through a five-year program. (b) Demonstration and commercial application projects (1) Establishment (A) The Secretary shall solicit proposals for demonstration and commercial application projects for renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies pursuant to subsection (c). Such projects may include projects for- (i) the production and sale