Berg v. Hudesman
115 Wn. 2d 657 (Wash. 1990) Cited 613 timesHolding that extrinsic evidence is admissible as to the entire circumstances under which the contract was made, as an aid in ascertaining the parties' intent and adopting the Restatement (Second) of Contracts §§ 212 and 214(c)
Wagner v. Wagner
95 Wn. 2d 94 (Wash. 1980) Cited 158 timesNo. 46976-8. December 31, 1980. [1] Divorce and Dissolution — Modification of Decree — Support Obligation — In General. In the absence of a contrary contractual agreement, support provisions of a dissolution decree are not subject to modification unless the circumstances have substantially changed in a manner that was not within the contemplation of the parties when the decree was entered. [2] Contracts — Construction — Contemporaneous Law. A contract incorporates the statutory and case law in existence
Section 62A.2-209 - Modification, rescission and waiver
Wash. Rev. Code § 62A.2-209 Cited 11 times(1) An agreement modifying a contract within this Article needs no consideration to be binding. (2) A signed agreement which excludes modification or rescission except by a signed writing or other signed record cannot be otherwise modified or rescinded, but except as between merchants such a requirement on a form supplied by the merchant must be separately signed by the other party. (3) The requirements of the statute of frauds section of this Article (RCW 62A.2-201) must be satisfied if the contract