6 Cited authorities

  1. Hangarter v. Provident Life and Acc. Ins. Co.

    373 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 920 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding a district court did not abuse its discretion in qualifying an insurance expert who testified on similar issues in twelve previous cases and had never been found unqualified
  2. Morales v. Fry

    CASE NO. C12-2235-JCC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 25, 2014)   Cited 12 times

    CASE NO. C12-2235-JCC 03-25-2014 MARIA J. MORALES, Plaintiff, v. SONYA FRY, et al., Defendants. John C. Coughenour THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the motion for summary judgment of Defendants Sonya Fry, Brian Rees, and Michelle Gallegos ("Officer Defendants") (Dkt. No. 55), the City of Seattle's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 52), and Plaintiff Maria Morales' motion for partial summary judgment against Officer Sonya Fry (Dkt. No. 43). Having thoroughly

  3. Vucinich v. Paine, Webber, Jackson Curtis

    803 F.2d 454 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 34 times
    Holding broker had fiduciary duty to fully inform client of nature and risks of selling short, "in terms capable of being understood by someone of [client's] education and experience"
  4. Coleman v. Evergreen Pub. Sch.

    CASE NO. C18-5556 RBL (W.D. Wash. Nov. 9, 2018)

    CASE NO. C18-5556 RBL 11-09-2018 ROBYN COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. EVERGREEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant. HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Coleman's Motion for Reconsideration [Dkt. # 23] of the Court's Order [Dkt. # 7] denying her Motion to Appoint Counsel [Dkt. # 1-3]. The Motion is DENIED for several reasons. First, the motion is untimely. LCR 7(h)(2) requires a motion for reconsideration to be filed within 14 days of the order it seeks to overturn. The

  5. Spencer v. Peters

    CASE NO. C11-5424 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 4, 2013)   Cited 1 times
    Finding expert's qualifications and experience adequate basis to deem expert's opinions regarding standard of practice for interview techniques reliable and relevant
  6. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 26,581 times   251 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the Daubert standard