§Why CasetextPricing

Pistey v. Lake Developers Partnership et al (TV3)

MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re MOTION to Alter Judgment and in the Alternative, for a New Trial Judgment

7 Cited authorities

  1. Bennett v. CMH Homes, Inc.

    661 F. App'x 329 (6th Cir. 2016)   Cited 1 times

    No. 15-5541 No. 15-5577 09-13-2016 DAN BENNETT and KAREN BENNETT, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. CMH HOMES, INC., dba Luv Nashville, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. ROGERS, Circuit Judge. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 16a0531n.06 ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE BEFORE: SUHRHEINRICH, ROGERS, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges. ROGERS, Circuit Judge. This case involves a defective mobile home, defectively installed such that

  2. Isaacs v. Bokor

    566 S.W.2d 532 (Tenn. 1978)   Cited 37 times
    In Isaacs v. Bokor, 566 S.W.2d 532 (Tenn. 1978), where rescission was granted for tortious misrepresentations of the seller, "[i]nterest was also allowed upon the purchase money which had been paid." Id. at 539.

  3. Bell v. Prefix, Inc.

    Case No. 05-74311 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 22, 2010)

    Case No. 05-74311. October 22, 2010 OPINION AND ORDER LAWRENCE ZATKOFF, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Enter Judgment with the Amount of Prejudgment Interest Calculated in Accordance with this Court's Opinion and Order and Judgment [dkt 159]. The parties have fully briefed the motions. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties' papers such that the decision process would not be significantly

  4. Simmons v. Evans

    185 Tenn. 282 (Tenn. 1947)   Cited 88 times
    Holding that the seller of a residence had a duty to disclose material facts to the buyer "unless common observation or such inquiry as the exercise of ordinary prudence required would have furnished such information"

  5. King v. Anderson

    618 S.W.2d 478 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1981)   Cited 4 times

    December 10, 1980. Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court June 29, 1981. Appeal from the Chancery Court, Henry County, Aaron C. Brown, Chancellor. Julian P. Guinn, Paris, for defendants-third party plaintiffs-appellants. Marvin P. Morton, Jr., Paris, for third party defendant-appellant. Lee M. Greer, Paris, for plaintiffs-appellees. OPINION WILLIAM S. RUSSELL, Special Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Chancery Court of Henry County, awarding plaintiffs a judgment against the defendants

  6. Rule 59 - New Trial; Altering or Amending a Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 59   Cited 43,332 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a party to move to alter or amend a judgment "no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment"

  7. Section 1961 - Interest

    28 U.S.C. § 1961   Cited 11,329 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 6621 applies to internal revenue tax cases