The California Institute of Technology v. Broadcom Limited et al

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Inequitable Conduct

C.D. Cal.March 14, 2019

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:16-cv-03714-GW-AGRx CALTECH’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP James R. Asperger (Bar No. 083188) jimasperger@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com Todd M. Briggs (Bar No. 209282) toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Attorneys for Plaintiff the California Institute of Technology UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA The CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, a California Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. BROADCOM LIMITED, BROADCOM CORPORATION, AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, AND APPLE INC., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:16-cv-3714-GW-AGRx CALTECH’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT Hon. George H. Wu United States District Court Judge Hearing Date: April 25, 2018 Time: 8:30 AM Place: Courtroom 9D Case 2:16-cv-03714-GW-AGR Document 942 Filed 03/14/19 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:50519 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- Case No. 2:16-cv-03714-GW-AGRx CALTECH’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 25, 2019 at 8:30 a.m., Plaintiff California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”) will and hereby does move the Court pursuant to Rule 56(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for partial summary judgment that no inequitable conduct occurred in this case. Caltech makes this motion on the grounds that Defendants Broadcom Limited, Broadcom Corporation, Avago Technologies Limited, and Apple Inc.(“Defendants”) cannot prove by clear and convincing evidence that any information that was but-for material to the patentability of any asserted patent was withheld from the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”) with specific intent to deceive by any person with a duty of disclosure. This motion is based on this Notice of Motion and Motion; the concurrently- filed Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Caltech’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct; the concurrently-filed Declarations of Margaret Shyr, Hui Jin, Ph.D. and Aamod Khandekar, Ph.D. (and all exhibits thereto); Caltech’s Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; the concurrently- lodged [Proposed] Order Granting Caltech’s Motion for Summary Judgment; the files and records in this action; and any such additional argument or materials as may be submitted to the Court before the time of the decision in this matter. This motion is made following the conference of counsel pursuant to C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-3, which took place telephonically on February 25, 2019. RELIEF REQUESTED Caltech respectfully requests that the Court grant Caltech’s Motion for Summary Judgement of No Inequitable Conduct. Case 2:16-cv-03714-GW-AGR Document 942 Filed 03/14/19 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:50520 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- Case No. 2:16-cv-03714-GW-AGRx CALTECH’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT DATED: March 14, 2019 Respectfully submitted, By /s/ James R. Asperger James R. Asperger jimasperger@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 Attorneys for Plaintiff California Institute of Technology Case 2:16-cv-03714-GW-AGR Document 942 Filed 03/14/19 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:50521