§Why CasetextPricing

The California Institute of Technology v. Broadcom Limited et al

REPLY in support of MOTION to Strike Sealed Declaration in SupportDeclaration, 500 , Sealed Declaration in SupportDeclaration,, 378 , Sealed Declaration in SupportDeclaration,,, 310 , Sealed Declaration in SupportDeclaration, 473 , Sealed Document, 445 , Seal 530

7 Cited authorities

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United States

    449 U.S. 383 (1981)   Cited 4,205 times   128 Legal Analyses
    Holding that communications between corporate counsel and a corporation's employees made for the purpose of rendering legal advice are protected by the attorney-client privilege

  2. Chevron Corp. v. Pennzoil Co.

    974 F.2d 1156 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 399 times
    Holding that the defendant implicitly waived the attorney-client privilege because it relied on an advice-of-counsel defense

  3. Weil v. Investment/Indicators, Research & Management, Inc.

    647 F.2d 18 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 423 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding subjective intent not dispositive and privilege waived

  4. Lopes v. Vieira

    688 F. Supp. 2d 1050 (E.D. Cal. 2010)   Cited 11 times
    In Lopes, following the reasoning of Rialto, the court found that a dissolved limited liability company that carried out no ongoing business lost its ability to invoke the attorney-client privilege.

  5. Lopes v. Vieira

    719 F. Supp. 2d 1199 (E.D. Cal. 2010)   Cited 8 times

    Case No. CV-F-06-1243 OWW/SMS. June 23, 2010. George M. Lee, Seiler Epstein Ziegler Applegate LLP, San Francisco, CA, Giles Edward Imrie, Douglas A. Applegate, Seiler Epstein Ziegler Applegate, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff. Blair Morgan White, Law Office of Blair M. White, San Andreas, CA, Jason Galek, Vincent O'Gara, Murphy, Pearson, Bradley Feeney, San Francisco, CA, James R. Kirby, Segal amp Kirby, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT DOWNEY

  6. Shared Med. Res., LLC v. Histologics, LLC

    Case No. SACV 12-0612 DOC (RNBx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2012)   Cited 1 times

    Case No. SACV 12-0612 DOC (RNBx) 11-14-2012 SHARED MEDICAL RESOURCES, LLC v. HISTOLOGICS, LLC ET AL. ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: None Present ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT: None Present DAVID O. CARTER CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER , JUDGE +-------------------------------+ ¦Julie Barrera ¦N/A ¦ +----------------+--------------¦ ¦Courtroom Clerk ¦Court Reporter¦ +-------------------------------+ ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: None Present ATTORNEYS PRESENT

  7. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 94,538 times   650 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37