§Why CasetextPricing

Thomas Atencio et al v. Tunecore, Inc. et al

REPLY for Relief 206 PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS UNTIMELY OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR POST TRIAL RELIEF

10 Cited authorities

  1. S.G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Dep't of Indus. Relations

    48 Cal.3d 341 (Cal. 1989)   Cited 444 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding that temporary “sharefarmers” were employees entitled to workers' compensation coverage

  2. Narayan v. EGL, Inc.

    616 F.3d 895 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 232 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that once drivers had established a prima facie case of employment status by coming forward with evidence that they provided services for the company, the burden shifted to the company to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the drivers were independent contractors

  3. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior Court

    220 Cal.App.3d 864 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 157 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no substantial evidence supported trial court's determination of independent contractor status in context of an order finding good faith settlement

  4. Ruiz v. Affinity Logistics Corp.

    667 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 74 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district courts applying California law are bound by the analytical framework set forth in Nedlloyd

  5. Tieberg v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.

    2 Cal.3d 943 (Cal. 1970)   Cited 122 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[t]he principal test of an employment relationship is whether the person to whom service is rendered has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired”

  6. Inter. Business Machines Corp. v. Bajorek

    191 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 44 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "in a transferred case, the choice of law rules of the transferor state apply"

  7. Yellow Cab Cooperative v. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.

    226 Cal.App.3d 1288 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 30 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that cab drivers provided service to cab company because “the enterprise could no more survive without [drivers] than it could without working cabs”

  8. Roche v. Morgan Collection, Inc.

    882 F. Supp. 2d 247 (D. Mass. 2012)   Cited 7 times

    Civil Action No. 12–30058–KPN. 2012-08-1 Joanna ROCHE, Plaintiff v. MORGAN COLLECTION, INC., Linda S. Kagan, and Andrew T. Morgan, Defendants. David E. Valicenti, Cain, Hibbard, Myers & Cook P.C., Christopher M. Hennessey, Pittsfield, MA, for Plaintiff. Jaclyn H. Grodin, Jamie B.W. Stecher, Jaclyn H. Grodin, New York, NY, Matthew P. Horvitz, Boston, MA, for Defendants. NEIMAN David E. Valicenti, Cain, Hibbard, Myers & Cook P.C., Christopher M. Hennessey, Pittsfield, MA, for Plaintiff. Jaclyn H. Grodin

  9. Baptista v. Abbey Healthcare Group, Inc.

    Civil Action Number 95-10125-RGS (D. Mass. Apr. 10, 1996)   Cited 8 times
    Declining to extend definition of "wages" to stock options

  10. Section 200 - Definitions

    Cal. Lab. Code § 200   Cited 378 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Applying this definition to "this article," meaning Cal. Lab. Code §§ 200 – 244