7 Cited authorities

  1. Carroll v. Del. River Port Auth.

    Civil Action 13-CV-02833 (D.N.J. Jul. 29, 2014)   Cited 8 times

    Civil Action 13-CV-02833 07-29-2014 ANTHONY J. CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY, Defendant. APPEARANCES: MATTHEW S. WOLF, ESQUIRE, LLC By: Matthew S. Wolf, Esq. 1236 Brace Road B. 2nd Floor Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08034 Counsel for Plaintiff DEASEY, MAHONEY, VALENTINI, & NORTH LTD By: Carla P. Maresca, Esq. 80 Tanner Street Haddonfield, New Jersey 08033 Counsel for Defendant IRENAS, Senior United States District Judge Hon. Joseph E. Irenas OPINION APPEARANCES: MATTHEW S. WOLF

  2. Levey v. Brownstone Inv. Grp., LLC

    Civil Action No.: 11-395 (ES) (D.N.J. Jun. 26, 2013)   Cited 7 times

    Civil Action No.: 11-395 (ES) 06-26-2013 GORDON LEVEY, Plaintiff, v. BROWNSTONE INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. Esther Salas NOT FOR PUBLICATION OPINION SALAS, District Judge I. Introduction Pending before the Court is Defendants Brownstone Investment Group, LLC ("Brownstone"), Douglas B. Lowey ("Lowey"), and Barret P. Naylor's ("Naylor") (collectively, "Defendants") motion to dismiss Plaintiff Gordon Levey's ("Levey" or "Plaintiff") Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") for lack of personal

  3. ADP, LLC v. Rafferty

    Civil Action No.: 18-1922 (JLL) (D.N.J. Apr. 2, 2018)   Cited 3 times

    Civil Action No.: 18-1922 (JLL) 04-02-2018 ADP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. NICOLE RAFFERTY, Defendant. LINARES, Chief District Judge. NOT FOR PUBLICATION OPINION LINARES, Chief District Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of Plaintiff ADP, LLC's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction against Defendant Nicole Rafferty pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. (ECF No. 3). The Court has considered the submissions made in support of and in opposition to Plaintiff's

  4. Adp, LLC v. Mork

    Civil Action No.: 17-4613 (CCC-MF) (D.N.J. Jun. 22, 2018)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No.: 17-4613 (CCC-MF) 06-22-2018 ADP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. KRISTI MORK, Defendant. CECCHI, District Judge. NOT FOR PUBLICATION OPINION CECCHI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on the motion of ADP, LLC ("Plaintiff") for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction as to Kristi Mork ("Defendant"), as well as Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees. (ECF No. 2-1 ("Mot.")). The Court has considered the submissions made in support of and in opposition

  5. United States v. Communities

    1:17-cv-366 (NLH/JS) (D.N.J. May. 9, 2018)   Cited 1 times

    1:17-cv-366 (NLH/JS) 05-09-2018 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NOBEL LEARNING COMMUNITIES d/b/a CHESTERBROOK ACADEMY, Defendant. APPEARANCES: JORDAN MILOWE ANGER DAVID V. SIMUNOVICH OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY 970 BROAD STREET, SUITE 700 NEWARK, NJ 07102 On behalf of Plaintiff CHARLOTTE L. LANVERS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1425 NEW YORK AVE., NW ROOM 4002 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 On behalf of Plaintiff BONNIE M. HOFFMAN HANGLEY ARONCHICK SEGAL PUDLIN & SCHILLER ONE LOGAN SQUARE 27TH FLOOR PHILADELPHIA

  6. Raritan Baykeeper, Inc. v. NL Indus., Inc.

    Civil Action No. 09-4117 (MAS) (DEA) (D.N.J. Aug. 29, 2018)

    Civil Action No. 09-4117 (MAS) (DEA) 08-29-2018 RARITAN BAYKEEPER, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. NL INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. SHIPP, District Judge NOT FOR PUBLICATION MEMORANDUM OPINION SHIPP , District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Raritan Baykeeper, Inc. and Edison Wetlands Association, Inc.'s (collectively, "Plaintiffs") Motion for Partial Reconsideration of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated March 27, 2018 finding that Plaintiffs lacked standing

  7. Dasque v. Nordstrom, Inc.

    Civil No. 02-5895 (AET) (D.N.J. Jun. 1, 2005)   Cited 1 times

    Civil No. 02-5895 (AET). June 1, 2005 MEMORANDUM ORDER ANNE THOMPSON, Senior District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [33-1]; Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Strike the Amended Complaint [41-1]; Plaintiff's Motion Opposing Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Strike the Amended Complaint [43-1]; and Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Partial Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Summary Judgment [44-1]. The Court has decided