No. 46738–1–II 07-12-2016 Aiken, St. Louis & Siljeg, P.S., Appellant, v. Jennifer M. Linth, in her individual capacity, in her capacity as Trustee of the Evelyn Plant Trust and in her capacity as Personal Representative of the estate of Carolyn Linth, Respondent. William A. Olson, Aiken St. Louis & Siljeg PS, 801 2nd Avenue Suite 1200, Seattle, WA, 98104–1571, Counsel for Appellant. Thomas Edward Seguine, Law Office of Tom Seguine, 1023 S 3rd St., Mount Vernon, WA, 98273–4301, Jennifer Linth (Appearing
No. 9831-4-I. January 10, 1983. [1] Liens — Attorney and Client — Compensation — Attorney's Lien — Construction. The attorney's lien created by RCW 60.40.010 is in derogation of the common law and will be strictly construed. [2] Liens — Attorney and Client — Compensation — Attorney's Lien — Success of Action — Necessity. No attorney's lien arises under RCW 60.40.010(3) or (4) against money in the hands of an adverse party or against a judgment unless the attorney's client was successful in obtaining
(a)Disposition of collateral: Continuation of security interest or agricultural lien; proceeds. Except as otherwise provided in this Article and in RCW 62A.2-403(2): (1) A security interest or agricultural lien continues in collateral notwithstanding sale, lease, license, exchange, or other disposition thereof unless the secured party authorized the disposition free of the security interest or agricultural lien; and (2) A security interest attaches to any identifiable proceeds of collateral. (b)When
The following rules govern priority among conflicting security interests in the same deposit account: (1) A security interest held by a secured party having control of the deposit account under RCW 62A.9A-104 has priority over a conflicting security interest held by a secured party that does not have control. (2) Except as otherwise provided in [subsections] (3) and (4) of this section, security interests perfected by control under RCW 62A.9A-314 rank according to priority in time of obtaining control