§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Nature G. Finch, Appellant.

Brief

39 Cited authorities

  1. Strickland v. Washington

    466 U.S. 668 (1984)   Cited 158,509 times   176 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "error by counsel" doesn't "warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding" where in the context of the whole proceeding the identified error "had no effect on the judgment"

  2. People v. Gray

    86 N.Y.2d 10 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 3,227 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the issue of evidentiary sufficiency must be preserved for appellate review

  3. People v. Alejandro

    70 N.Y.2d 133 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 1,214 times
    Reviewing the legislature's intent to create a "demanding standard" for the sufficiency of informations

  4. Broughton v. State of N.Y

    37 N.Y.2d 451 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 1,774 times
    Holding that "[w]henever there has been an arrest and imprisonment without a warrant, the officer has acted extrajudicially and the presumption arises that such an arrest and imprisonment are unlawful"

  5. People v. Turner

    2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8766 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 522 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding appellate counsel ineffective for not raising ineffectiveness of trial counsel on appeal

  6. People v. Bigelow

    66 N.Y.2d 417 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 854 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the "good-faith exception" to the warrant requirement

  7. People v. Hobot

    84 N.Y.2d 1021 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 363 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Argued November 30, 1994 Decided January 17, 1995 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Alan D. Marrus, J. Leighton M. Jackson, Brooklyn, for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney of Kings County, Brooklyn (Ruth E. Ross, Jay M. Cohen and Roseann B. MacKechnie of counsel), for respondent. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of two counts of rape in the first degree

  8. People v. Concepcion

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5110 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 224 times
    Noting that New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 470.15 bars the Appellate Division "from affirming a judgment, sentence or order on a ground not decided adversely to the appellant by the trial court"

  9. People v. Jones

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9070 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 227 times
    Dismissing an information alleging disorderly conduct because there was no indication that the defendant "when he stood in the middle of the sidewalk . . . had the intent to or recklessly created a risk of causing 'public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm'"

  10. People v. Jensen

    86 N.Y.2d 248 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 208 times

    Argued June 7, 1995 Decided July 5, 1995 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, William C. Barrett, J. Michael D. Pinnisi, Ithaca, for appellant. George M. Dentes, District Attorney of Tompkins County, Ithaca (Gary U. Surdell of counsel), for respondent. CIPARICK, J. The question presented on this appeal is whether the Grand Jury evidence is legally sufficient to support the indictment. We agree with the Appellate Division that it is. On November