§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Nature G. Finch, Appellant.

Brief

20 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Gray

    86 N.Y.2d 10 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 3,227 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the issue of evidentiary sufficiency must be preserved for appellate review

  2. People v. Bigelow

    66 N.Y.2d 417 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 854 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the "good-faith exception" to the warrant requirement

  3. People v. Jones

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9070 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 227 times
    Dismissing an information alleging disorderly conduct because there was no indication that the defendant "when he stood in the middle of the sidewalk . . . had the intent to or recklessly created a risk of causing 'public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm'"

  4. People v. Munafo

    50 N.Y.2d 326 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 148 times
    Holding that "the disruptive behavior proscribed by disorderly conduct statute must be of public rather than individual dimension"

  5. City of Bremerton v. Widell

    146 Wn. 2d 561 (Wash. 2002)   Cited 42 times
    Approving of Section 189 and its comment c, dealing with a tenant's privilege of entry and the privilege of those who enter in the tenant's right

  6. People v. Leonard

    62 N.Y.2d 404 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 67 times
    Finding university had promulgated rules authorizing exclusion from campus of an individual who, due to past conduct, was no longer welcome on campus

  7. People v. Voliton

    83 N.Y.2d 192 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 38 times
    In People v Voliton (83 NY2d 192), the Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division (190 AD2d 764, 767 [2d Dept]) which expressly found that the acts of the police in detaining and attempting to seize him "were unlawful at the time the alleged injuries [to the police] were inflicted."

  8. People v. Scott

    26 N.Y.2d 286 (N.Y. 1970)   Cited 81 times

    Argued January 19, 1970 Decided April 15, 1970 Appeal from the County Court of Broome County, HAROLD R. CLARK, J. Travis Johnson for appellant. David H. Cohen for respondent. BURKE, J. Defendant is the owner of a 30-acre tract of land in the Town of Vestal. Twenty acres were leased to his son on February 1, 1954 for an indefinite term which can be terminated by a 60-day notice given by either party; the agreed rent is $1 per month as contained in a written lease. On the demised premises, the son

  9. Commonwealth v. Hicks

    267 Va. 573 (Va. 2004)   Cited 20 times
    Upholding the defendant's conviction under Code § 18.2-119 where the defendant willfully entered upon Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority property after receiving a letter from the manager of the property forbidding him from returning to the property

  10. State v. Dixon

    169 Vt. 15 (Vt. 1999)   Cited 25 times
    Acknowledging that 13 V.S.A. § 3705 should be informed by common law and read in context with it