28 Cited authorities

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist.

    2 Cal.4th 962 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 1,170 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Aubry, supra, 42 Cal.App.4th 579 at pages 587 through 588, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 703, the court, citing language from Labor Council, held the Regents were not required to pay private contractors the prevailing wage under section 1770 et seq., which applies to public works, for the construction of student and staff housing.
  2. McKell v. Washington Mutual Inc.

    142 Cal.App.4th 1457 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 695 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a loan transaction is a business practice under the UCL
  3. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.

    19 Cal.4th 26 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 745 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that title insurer owed no duty of ordinary care to non-clients, commenting that "[i]n the business arena it would be unprecedented to impose a duty on one actor to operate its business in a manner that would ensure the financial success of transactions between third parties"
  4. Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.

    23 Cal.4th 163 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 549 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding restitution is "the return of the excess of what the plaintiff gave the defendant over the value of what the plaintiff received"
  5. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.

    35 Cal.3d 197 (Cal. 1983)   Cited 704 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no fiduciary relationship existed between advertisers of cereal and consumers because "it is unnecessary to call upon the law of fiduciary relationships to perform a function for which it was not designed and is largely unsuited"
  6. Linear Tech. v. Applied Materials

    152 Cal.App.4th 115 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 210 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a corporate plaintiff "may not rely on the UCL" in a contract action where neither the general public or individual consumers are implicated
  7. Arce v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

    181 Cal.App.4th 471 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 180 times
    Holding that the defendant's "alleged practice of categorically denying coverage" of certain services for autism-related disorders purportedly encompassed by the terms of a health care plan was sufficient to state a class action UCL claim
  8. Pineda v. Bank of America, N.A.

    50 Cal.4th 1389 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 154 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that penalties for violation of Labor Code § 203 are not recoverable under the UCL
  9. In re Pomona Valley Medical Group

    476 F.3d 665 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 103 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that applications of the business-judgment rule are reviewable under the clearly erroneous standard because they "involve questions of fact"
  10. Hambrick v. Healthcare Partners Med. Grp., Inc.

    238 Cal.App.4th 124 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 65 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that the UCL "provide for only equitable relief, specifically injunctive relief and restitution"
  11. Section 17204 - Actions for Injunctions by Attorney General, District Attorney, County Counsel, and City Attorneys

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17204   Cited 933 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Allowing actions brought by "any person who has suffered injury in fact and has lost money or property"
  12. Section 17201 - Person defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17201   Cited 78 times

    As used in this chapter, the term person shall mean and include natural persons, corporations, firms, partnerships, joint stock companies, associations and other organizations of persons. Ca. Bus. and Prof'l. Code § 17201 Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 299.